Intraday BUY SELL Signals
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GDMA vs NOC
GDMA vs NOC Comparison
Open Charts GDMA vs NOC
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Price$38.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
Volume$7.65K
Net Assets157.95M
Northrop Grumman
Price$553.62
Change+$6.65 (+1.22%)
Volume$9.22K
Capitalization77.86B
GDMA vs NOC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GDMA vs. NOC commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDMA is a Hold and NOC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOC: Fundamental Ratings
NOC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GDMA | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 7 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 7 days ago 33% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 17 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 55% | 11 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 53% | 7 days ago 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GDMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDMA and NEM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDMA and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDMA | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| NEM - GDMA | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
| LMT - GDMA | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| AEE - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
| NOC - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| DLTR - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
More | ||||
NOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been loosely correlated with RTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then RTX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y