Intraday BUY SELL Signals
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GDMA vs NOC
GDMA vs NOC Comparison
Open Charts GDMA vs NOC
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Price$41.28
Change+$0.50 (+1.23%)
Volume$200
Net Assets173.93M
Northrop Grumman
Price$653.28
Change+$27.78 (+4.44%)
Volume$14.08K
Capitalization93.22B
GDMA vs NOC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GDMA vs. NOC commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDMA is a Hold and NOC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOC: Fundamental Ratings
NOC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GDMA | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 58% | 8 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EZA | 73.09 | 0.31 | +0.43% |
| iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | |||
| GDOC | 36.28 | 0.13 | +0.36% |
| Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Eq ETF | |||
| LDSF | 19.22 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
| First Trust Low Dur Strat Foc ETF | |||
| TSEL | 28.49 | -0.05 | -0.17% |
| Touchstone Sands Capital US Sel Gr ETF | |||
| ESGD | 97.99 | -0.58 | -0.59% |
| iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF | |||
GDMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDMA and NEM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDMA and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDMA | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| NEM - GDMA | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.48% | ||
| GOLD - GDMA | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.69% | ||
| LMT - GDMA | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
| AEE - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| NOC - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||
NOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been loosely correlated with RTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then RTX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y