GDLNF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
46.95M
GMBXF
Price
$6.07
Change
+$0.09 (+1.51%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
40.64B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDLNF vs GMBXF

Header iconGDLNF vs GMBXF Comparison
Open Charts GDLNF vs GMBXFBanner chart's image
ENERGY TRANSITION MINERALS
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$139.77K
Capitalization46.95M
Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C.V
Price$6.07
Change+$0.09 (+1.51%)
Volume$1.51K
Capitalization40.64B
GDLNF vs GMBXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GDLNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDLNF vs. GMBXF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDLNF is a Hold and GMBXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GDLNF: $0.03 vs. GMBXF: $6.07)
Brand notoriety: GDLNF and GMBXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDLNF: 156% vs. GMBXF: 12%
Market capitalization -- GDLNF: $46.95M vs. GMBXF: $40.64B
GDLNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $46.95M. GMBXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $40.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDLNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGMBXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GDLNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GMBXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMBXF is a better buy in the long-term than GDLNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDLNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMBXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDLNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GMBXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMBXF is a better buy in the short-term than GDLNF.

Price Growth

GDLNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.30% price change this week, while GMBXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

GMBXF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMBXF($40.6B) has a higher market cap than GDLNF($47M). GDLNF YTD gains are higher at: 74.211 vs. GMBXF (29.424). GMBXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.1B vs. GDLNF (-94.14M). GMBXF has more cash in the bank: 6.63B vs. GDLNF (30.3M). GDLNF has less debt than GMBXF: GDLNF (751K) vs GMBXF (8.82B). GMBXF has higher revenues than GDLNF: GMBXF (14B) vs GDLNF (41K).
GDLNFGMBXFGDLNF / GMBXF
Capitalization47M40.6B0%
EBITDA-94.14M7.1B-1%
Gain YTD74.21129.424252%
P/E RatioN/A12.74-
Revenue41K14B0%
Total Cash30.3M6.63B0%
Total Debt751K8.82B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDLNF vs GMBXF: Fundamental Ratings
GDLNF
GMBXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10031
SMR RATING
1..100
9848
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10070
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GMBXF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDLNF (53). This means that GMBXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

GMBXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDLNF (100). This means that GMBXF’s stock grew significantly faster than GDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

GMBXF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDLNF (98). This means that GMBXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

GMBXF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as GDLNF (46). This means that GMBXF’s stock grew similarly to GDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

GMBXF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GDLNF (100). This means that GMBXF’s stock grew similarly to GDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDLNFGMBXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDLNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EULIF0.05N/A
+2.00%
EUROPEAN LITHIUM LTD.
NRDBY15.000.20
+1.35%
Nordea Bank Abp
ECIA0.37N/A
N/A
Encision, Inc.
FOSUF0.60N/A
N/A
Fosun International, Ltd.
MYTAY26.06-0.30
-1.13%
Magyar Telekom Telecommunications Plc.

GDLNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDLNF and BBBMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDLNF and BBBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDLNF
1D Price
Change %
GDLNF100%
+3.44%
BBBMF - GDLNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLATF - GDLNF
8%
Poorly correlated
+11.16%
GMBXF - GDLNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
GOMRF - GDLNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+7.24%
GDQMF - GDLNF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
More

GMBXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMBXF has been loosely correlated with IVPAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMBXF jumps, then IVPAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMBXF
1D Price
Change %
GMBXF100%
+1.51%
IVPAF - GMBXF
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
LUNMF - GMBXF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
GLNCY - GMBXF
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
CSCCF - GMBXF
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
GLCNF - GMBXF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
More