Advertisement
GDLNF vs GLATF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDLNF is a Hold and GLATF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GDLNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLATF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GDLNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GLATF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GDLNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLATF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GDLNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- GLATF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GDLNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while GLATF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.51%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.50% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| GDLNF | GLATF | GDLNF / GLATF | |
| Capitalization | 84.3M | 152M | 55% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -7.35M | - |
| Gain YTD | 188.421 | -28.622 | -658% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 28.13 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 805K | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 25.8M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 6.35M | - |
GDLNF | GLATF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GDLNF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (94). This means that GDLNF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.
GDLNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (100). This means that GDLNF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.
GLATF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as GDLNF (99). This means that GLATF’s stock grew similarly to GDLNF’s over the last 12 months.
GDLNF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (65). This means that GDLNF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.
GLATF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDLNF (100). This means that GLATF’s stock grew significantly faster than GDLNF’s over the last 12 months.
| GDLNF | GLATF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
GDLNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDLNF and BBBMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDLNF and BBBMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDLNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDLNF | 100% | +10.71% | ||
| BBBMF - GDLNF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLATF - GDLNF | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| GMBXF - GDLNF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
| GOMRF - GDLNF | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.73% | ||
| GDQMF - GDLNF | -2% Poorly correlated | +4.21% | ||
More | ||||
GLATF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLATF has been loosely correlated with SYHBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLATF jumps, then SYHBF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLATF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLATF | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| SYHBF - GLATF | 46% Loosely correlated | +5.65% | ||
| LTSRF - GLATF | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.63% | ||
| TECK - GLATF | 25% Poorly correlated | +4.70% | ||
| IVPAF - GLATF | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.84% | ||
| MTRN - GLATF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
More | ||||