GCWOF
Price
$9.57
Change
+$0.37 (+4.02%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.19B
HLBZF
Price
$225.21
Change
-$0.90 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCWOF vs HLBZF

Header iconGCWOF vs HLBZF Comparison
Open Charts GCWOF vs HLBZFBanner chart's image
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua SAB de CV
Price$9.57
Change+$0.37 (+4.02%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization3.19B
HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG
Price$225.21
Change-$0.90 (-0.40%)
Volume$113
Capitalization15.13B
GCWOF vs HLBZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCWOF vs. HLBZF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCWOF is a Hold and HLBZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GCWOF: $9.57 vs. HLBZF: $225.21)
Brand notoriety: GCWOF and HLBZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCWOF: 72% vs. HLBZF: 12%
Market capitalization -- GCWOF: $3.19B vs. HLBZF: $15.13B
GCWOF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $3.19B. HLBZF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $15.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCWOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLBZF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GCWOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HLBZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLBZF is a better buy in the long-term than GCWOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCWOF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLBZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCWOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HLBZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCWOF is a better buy in the short-term than HLBZF.

Price Growth

GCWOF (@Construction Materials) experienced а +4.02% price change this week, while HLBZF (@Construction Materials) price change was -6.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.18% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLBZF($15.1B) has a higher market cap than GCWOF($3.19B). GCWOF has higher P/E ratio than HLBZF: GCWOF (12.33) vs HLBZF (8.46). HLBZF YTD gains are higher at: 79.450 vs. GCWOF (9.371). HLBZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.77B vs. GCWOF (288M). HLBZF has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. GCWOF (770M). GCWOF has less debt than HLBZF: GCWOF (516M) vs HLBZF (8.71B). HLBZF has higher revenues than GCWOF: HLBZF (21.1B) vs GCWOF (1.25B).
GCWOFHLBZFGCWOF / HLBZF
Capitalization3.19B15.1B21%
EBITDA288M3.77B8%
Gain YTD9.37179.45012%
P/E Ratio12.338.46146%
Revenue1.25B21.1B6%
Total Cash770M1.75B44%
Total Debt516M8.71B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCWOF vs HLBZF: Fundamental Ratings
GCWOF
HLBZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5096
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4411
SMR RATING
1..100
5186
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
389
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLBZF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCWOF (78). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCWOF (44). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLBZF (86). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLBZF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (50). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (38). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCWOFHLBZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBMOX48.650.29
+0.60%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Tr
LAMHX25.090.12
+0.48%
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
NSOPX17.590.06
+0.34%
North Star Opportunity A
NESYX63.460.17
+0.27%
Natixis US Equity Opportunities Y
FBONX37.210.08
+0.22%
American Funds American Balanced 529-F-3

GCWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCWOF and CTXXF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCWOF and CTXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCWOF
1D Price
Change %
GCWOF100%
+4.02%
CTXXF - GCWOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTOY - GCWOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
HLBZF - GCWOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
HCMLY - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
HDLMY - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
More

HLBZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLBZF and HDLMY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLBZF and HDLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLBZF
1D Price
Change %
HLBZF100%
-0.40%
HDLMY - HLBZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
BRKWF - HLBZF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMLY - HLBZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
FRCEF - HLBZF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCWOF - HLBZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
More