Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVUX vs RWMHX
GCVUX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts GCVUX vs RWMHX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6
Price$26.09
Change+$0.91 (+3.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets647.41M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.01
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
GCVUX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVUX vs. RWMHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVUX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. GCVUX (647M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than GCVUX: RWMHX (1.36) vs GCVUX (1.17). GCVUX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: GCVUX (11 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). GCVUX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). GCVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVUX: RWMHX (250) vs GCVUX (5000000). GCVUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. RWMHX (5.40). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. GCVUX (22.07).
| GCVUX | RWMHX | GCVUX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.41 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.41 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.329 | 1.523 | 350% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 647M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.36 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.38 | 5.40 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.96 | 30.10 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.07 | 37.20 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.68 | 96.94 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers