Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVUX vs RMFCX
GCVUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCVUX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6
Price$24.40
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets538.73M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.07
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
GCVUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVUX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GCVUX (539M). RMFCX (1.26) and GCVUX (1.22) have matching dividends . GCVUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCVUX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GCVUX (0.65). GCVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVUX: RMFCX (250) vs GCVUX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. GCVUX (-2.70). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.95 vs. GCVUX (29.88).
| GCVUX | RMFCX | GCVUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.91 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.242 | 10.721 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 539M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.70 | 7.77 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.12 | 22.69 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.88 | 54.95 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.16 | 79.02 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers