Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVUX vs RMEBX
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVUX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6
Price$24.50
Change+$0.07 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets539.34M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVUX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GCVUX (539M). GCVUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GCVUX (1.21) vs RMEBX (1.12). GCVUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVUX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCVUX (0.65). GCVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVUX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVUX (5000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. GCVUX (-1.57). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.35 vs. GCVUX (35.20).
| GCVUX | RMEBX | GCVUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.07 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.678 | 11.253 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 539M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.12 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.57 | 11.26 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.78 | 30.31 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.20 | 59.35 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers