Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVUX vs RMEBX
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVUX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6
Price$25.12
Change+$0.13 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.53M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVUX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GCVUX (562M). GCVUX (1.10) and RMEBX (1.05) have matching dividends . GCVUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVUX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCVUX (0.65). GCVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVUX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVUX (5000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. GCVUX (-5.28). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. GCVUX (32.01).
| GCVUX | RMEBX | GCVUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.07 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.706 | 13.527 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.05 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.28 | 4.81 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.07 | 38.19 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.01 | 55.95 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.58 | 89.36 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers