Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVAX vs RMEBX
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts A
Price$24.55
Change+$0.07 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets539.34M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GCVAX (539M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVAX: RMEBX (1.12) vs GCVAX (0.88). GCVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVAX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and GCVAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . GCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVAX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. GCVAX (-1.93). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.35 vs. GCVAX (33.00).
| GCVAX | RMEBX | GCVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.433 | 11.253 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 539M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.93 | 11.26 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.41 | 30.31 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.00 | 59.35 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.31 | 80.17 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers