Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVAX vs RMEBX
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts A
Price$25.33
Change+$0.23 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets559.08M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.62
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GCVAX (559M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVAX: RMEBX (1.09) vs GCVAX (0.85). GCVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVAX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and GCVAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . GCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVAX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. GCVAX (-3.51). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.00 vs. GCVAX (37.01).
| GCVAX | RMEBX | GCVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.815 | 13.105 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 559M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.09 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.51 | 6.26 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.57 | 41.49 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.01 | 62.00 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.48 | 101.70 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers