Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVAX vs RMEBX
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts A
Price$23.47
Change-$0.27 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets516.72M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. GCVAX (517M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVAX: RMEBX (1.16) vs GCVAX (0.85). GCVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and GCVAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . GCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVAX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. GCVAX (-2.36). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. GCVAX (31.17).
| GCVAX | RMEBX | GCVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.444 | 5.923 | 24% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 517M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.16 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.36 | 8.54 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.58 | 27.89 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.17 | 58.69 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.27 | 68.22 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement