Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVAX vs RMEBX
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts A
Price$25.92
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets583.07M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GCVAX (583M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVAX: RMEBX (1.05) vs GCVAX (0.78). GCVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVAX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and GCVAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . GCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVAX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. GCVAX (-4.80). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. GCVAX (28.56).
| GCVAX | RMEBX | GCVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.604 | 14.940 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 583M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.80 | 6.55 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.42 | 30.03 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.56 | 53.80 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.08 | 92.20 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers