Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVAX vs RMEBX
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts A
Price$25.17
Change+$0.12 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.53M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GCVAX (562M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVAX: RMEBX (1.05) vs GCVAX (0.78). GCVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVAX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and GCVAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . GCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVAX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. GCVAX (-5.66). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. GCVAX (29.68).
| GCVAX | RMEBX | GCVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.345 | 13.527 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.66 | 4.81 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.62 | 38.19 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.68 | 55.95 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.84 | 89.36 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement