Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCTRX vs RWMFX
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$52.31
Change-$0.34 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.18B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.49
Change-$0.66 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.93B
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. GCTRX (4.18B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWMFX (1.42) vs GCTRX (0.38). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCTRX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GCTRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWMFX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.37 vs. RWMFX (3.75). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 88.52 vs. RWMFX (49.66).
| GCTRX | RWMFX | GCTRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.274 | 9.300 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.18B | 208B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.42 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.37 | 3.75 | 304% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.30 | 42.87 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.52 | 49.66 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers