Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCTRX vs RWMFX
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$55.01
Change+$1.94 (+3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. GCTRX (4.44B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWMFX (1.45) vs GCTRX (0.52). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCTRX (8 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GCTRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWMFX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.93 vs. RWMFX (5.51). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 78.65 vs. RWMFX (37.79).
| GCTRX | RWMFX | GCTRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.965 | 1.520 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 208B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.45 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.93 | 5.51 | 271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.60 | 30.53 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.65 | 37.79 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement