Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCTRX vs RWMFX
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$54.17
Change+$0.09 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.33B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$68.38
Change+$0.31 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. GCTRX (4.33B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWMFX (1.38) vs GCTRX (0.37). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCTRX (8 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GCTRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWMFX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.33 vs. RWMFX (4.73). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 86.59 vs. RWMFX (44.64).
| GCTRX | RWMFX | GCTRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.954 | 11.848 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.33B | 209B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 1.38 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.33 | 4.73 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.37 | 29.75 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.59 | 44.64 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement