Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCTRX vs RWMFX
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$54.86
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.43B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.56
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. GCTRX (4.43B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWMFX (1.47) vs GCTRX (0.53). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCTRX (8 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GCTRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWMFX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.42 vs. RWMFX (10.01). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 83.79 vs. RWMFX (40.22).
| GCTRX | RWMFX | GCTRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.687 | 2.164 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.43B | 208B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.47 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.42 | 10.01 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.31 | 31.75 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.79 | 40.22 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement