Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCTRX vs RWEBX
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$54.86
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.43B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.10
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. GCTRX (4.43B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWEBX (0.79) vs GCTRX (0.53). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GCTRX (8 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GCTRX (0.68). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWEBX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.42 vs. RWEBX (9.12). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 83.79 vs. RWEBX (35.86).
| GCTRX | RWEBX | GCTRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.687 | 2.132 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.43B | 208B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.79 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.42 | 9.12 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.31 | 28.67 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.79 | 35.86 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers