Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCTRX vs RWEBX
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$53.18
Change-$0.92 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.32B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.38
Change-$0.95 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. GCTRX (4.32B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWEBX (0.76) vs GCTRX (0.37). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GCTRX (8 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GCTRX (0.68). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWEBX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. RWEBX (4.46). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 92.39 vs. RWEBX (43.13).
| GCTRX | RWEBX | GCTRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.082 | 10.741 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.32B | 209B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.76 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.57 | 4.46 | 259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.94 | 29.97 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.39 | 43.13 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement