Advertisement
GCT vs WGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCT is a Buy and WGS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GCT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GCT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GCT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GCT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GCT (@Computer Communications) experienced а +2.44% price change this week, while WGS (@Medical Specialties) price change was +3.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.47%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +5.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.01%.
Reported Earning Dates
GCT is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2025.
WGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-0.65% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Medical Specialties (+5.04% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| GCT | WGS | GCT / WGS | |
| Capitalization | 1.19B | 3.47B | 34% |
| EBITDA | 160M | 54.3M | 295% |
| Gain YTD | 70.086 | 56.974 | 123% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.52 | 1508.13 | 1% |
| Revenue | 1.19B | 362M | 330% |
| Total Cash | 303M | 135M | 224% |
| Total Debt | 468M | 114M | 411% |
| GCT | WGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 89% | 8 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
GCT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCT has been loosely correlated with LSPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCT jumps, then LSPD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCT | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| LSPD - GCT | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| ALRM - GCT | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| AEYE - GCT | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| PDFS - GCT | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| IMMR - GCT | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
More | ||||
WGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WGS and CDNA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WGS and CDNA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WGS | 100% | -4.17% | ||
| CDNA - WGS | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.36% | ||
| OPK - WGS | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.86% | ||
| ATEN - WGS | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
| GCT - WGS | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
| CDNS - WGS | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.63% | ||
More | ||||