Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCPNX vs GSFPX
GCPNX vs GSFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCPNX vs. GSFPX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCPNX is a Hold and GSFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.72B vs. GCPNX (307M). GSFPX pays higher dividends than GCPNX: GSFPX (1.10) vs GCPNX (0.63). GCPNX was incepted earlier than GSFPX: GCPNX (9 years) vs GSFPX (8 years). GCPNX (1.05) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). GSFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. GCPNX (19.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCPNX: GSFPX (0) vs GCPNX (1000000). GCPNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.46 vs. GSFPX (9.53). GCPNX return over 5 years is better than : 64.61 vs. GSFPX (37.99).
| GCPNX | GSFPX | GCPNX / GSFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.68 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.74 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.538 | 0.826 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307M | 3.72B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.10 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.46 | 9.53 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.58 | 40.32 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.61 | 37.99 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement