GCMG
Price
$12.19
Change
-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
415.35M
11 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$20.02
Change
-$0.29 (-1.43%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.65B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCMG vs OWL

Header iconGCMG vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts GCMG vs OWLBanner chart's image
GCM Grosvenor
Price$12.19
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Volume$376.48K
Capitalization415.35M
Blue Owl Capital
Price$20.02
Change-$0.29 (-1.43%)
Volume$8.93M
Capitalization8.65B
GCMG vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCMG vs. OWL commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCMG is a StrongBuy and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GCMG: $12.19 vs. OWL: $20.02)
Brand notoriety: GCMG and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCMG: 74% vs. OWL: 127%
Market capitalization -- GCMG: $415.35M vs. OWL: $8.65B
GCMG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $415.35M. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GCMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCMG is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCMG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than GCMG.

Price Growth

GCMG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.22% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

GCMG is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($8.65B) has a higher market cap than GCMG($415M). OWL has higher P/E ratio than GCMG: OWL (185.70) vs GCMG (80.00). GCMG YTD gains are higher at: 1.014 vs. OWL (-12.295). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 633M vs. GCMG (4.93M). OWL has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. GCMG (44.4M). GCMG has less debt than OWL: GCMG (426M) vs OWL (2B). OWL has higher revenues than GCMG: OWL (1.73B) vs GCMG (457M).
GCMGOWLGCMG / OWL
Capitalization415M8.65B5%
EBITDA4.93M633M1%
Gain YTD1.014-12.295-8%
P/E Ratio80.00185.7043%
Revenue457M1.73B26%
Total Cash44.4M104M43%
Total Debt426M2B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCMG: Fundamental Ratings
GCMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
7
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCMGOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIV12.390.08
+0.65%
RiverNorth Opportunities Fund
SUSC23.120.07
+0.30%
iShares ESG USD Corporate Bond ETF
FKU47.15N/A
N/A
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX® ETF
LFAJ128.34N/A
N/A
LifeX 2051 Longevity Income ETF
BETE83.96-2.01
-2.34%
ProShares Bitcoin & Eth Eq Wgh ETF

GCMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCMG has been loosely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCMG jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCMG
1D Price
Change %
GCMG100%
-0.08%
TROW - GCMG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
AMP - GCMG
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
ARES - GCMG
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
OWL - GCMG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
HLNE - GCMG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
-1.43%
ARES - OWL
86%
Closely correlated
+3.13%
KKR - OWL
86%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
APO - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
TPG - OWL
83%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
CG - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
More