Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$24.66
Change+$0.15 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets537.81M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GCLSX (538M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (1.12) vs GCLSX (0.51). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. GCLSX (1.27). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. GCLSX (36.54).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.778 | 9.495 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 538M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.12 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.27 | 11.31 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.42 | 28.70 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.54 | 60.65 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.14 | 77.57 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers