Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLLX vs RWMFX
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCLLX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity C
Price$17.57
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets456.1M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLLX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLLX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. GCLLX (456M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCLLX: RWMFX (1.43) vs GCLLX (0.00). GCLLX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCLLX (18 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GCLLX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCLLX: RWMFX (250) vs GCLLX (1000). GCLLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.20 vs. RWMFX (7.95). GCLLX (52.84) and RWMFX (50.81) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GCLLX | RWMFX | GCLLX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.31 | 542% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.31 | 645% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.759 | 8.213 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 456M | 205B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.20 | 7.95 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.11 | 34.82 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.84 | 50.81 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.10 | 83.34 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement