Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLLX vs RWMFX
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCLLX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity C
Price$16.74
Change-$0.29 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.84M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.86
Change-$0.96 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLLX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLLX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. GCLLX (379M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCLLX: RWMFX (1.41) vs GCLLX (0.00). GCLLX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCLLX (18 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GCLLX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCLLX: RWMFX (250) vs GCLLX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. GCLLX (-0.53). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.43 vs. GCLLX (38.81).
| GCLLX | RWMFX | GCLLX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.31 | 542% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.31 | 645% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.079 | 11.486 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.53 | 5.30 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.71 | 32.83 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.81 | 47.43 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.06 | 82.53 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement