Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIIX vs VFWPX
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIIX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Instl
Price$18.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.54B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$150.52
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.16B
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIIX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 74.2B vs. GCIIX (4.54B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIIX: VFWPX (2.74) vs GCIIX (1.82). GCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIIX (28 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIIX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). GCIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.47 vs. VFWPX (18.07). GCIIX return over 5 years is better than : 68.45 vs. VFWPX (45.32).
| GCIIX | VFWPX | GCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.094 | 26.221 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.54B | 74.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 2.74 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.47 | 18.07 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.56 | 63.09 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.45 | 45.32 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.48 | 70.07 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers