Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIIX vs VFWPX
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIIX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Instl
Price$19.16
Change+$0.13 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.89B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$152.46
Change+$0.47 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIIX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GCIIX (4.89B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIIX: VFWPX (2.69) vs GCIIX (1.77). GCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIIX (28 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIIX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). GCIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.08 vs. VFWPX (21.84). GCIIX return over 5 years is better than : 58.14 vs. VFWPX (31.87).
| GCIIX | VFWPX | GCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.678 | 26.993 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.89B | 75.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 2.69 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.08 | 21.84 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.42 | 42.46 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.14 | 31.87 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.00 | 73.55 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement