Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIIX vs VFWPX
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIIX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Instl
Price$18.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.02B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$153.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.1B
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIIX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 76.1B vs. GCIIX (5.02B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIIX: VFWPX (2.69) vs GCIIX (1.77). GCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIIX (28 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIIX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). GCIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.62 vs. VFWPX (27.99). GCIIX return over 5 years is better than : 52.00 vs. VFWPX (32.63).
| GCIIX | VFWPX | GCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.084 | 28.821 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.02B | 76.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 2.69 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.62 | 27.99 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.94 | 49.82 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.00 | 32.63 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.83 | 79.72 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement