Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIIX vs VFWPX
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIIX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Instl
Price$19.53
Change+$1.05 (+5.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.6B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$163.39
Change+$13.31 (+8.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.2B
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIIX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. GCIIX (5.6B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIIX: VFWPX (2.93) vs GCIIX (1.54). GCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIIX (28 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 156.00 vs. VFWPX (6.00). GCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIIX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). GCIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.16 vs. VFWPX (34.29). GCIIX return over 5 years is better than : 60.60 vs. VFWPX (34.77).
| GCIIX | VFWPX | GCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.485 | 6.471 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.6B | 78.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 2.93 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.16 | 34.29 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.05 | 47.98 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.60 | 34.77 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.87 | 110.45 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers