Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIIX vs VFWPX
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIIX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Instl
Price$19.15
Change+$0.13 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.83B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$154.03
Change+$0.76 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIIX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GCIIX (4.83B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIIX: VFWPX (2.70) vs GCIIX (1.80). GCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIIX (28 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIIX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). GCIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.99 vs. VFWPX (25.36). GCIIX return over 5 years is better than : 67.16 vs. VFWPX (39.87).
| GCIIX | VFWPX | GCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.473 | 29.164 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.83B | 75.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.70 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 25.36 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.29 | 50.03 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.16 | 39.87 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.78 | 79.71 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers