Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIFX vs VFWPX
GCIFX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIFX vs VFWPX
Green Century MSCI Intl Indx Instl
Price$15.54
Change+$0.24 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.55M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$146.57
Change+$1.25 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
GCIFX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIFX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIFX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. GCIFX (171M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIFX: VFWPX (2.68) vs GCIFX (1.41). GCIFX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIFX (9 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). VFWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 5.00 vs. GCIFX (3.00). GCIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIFX (250000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.96 vs. GCIFX (6.98). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.89 vs. GCIFX (37.20).
| GCIFX | VFWPX | GCIFX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.03 | 3,267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.03 | 3,267% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.057 | 21.701 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171M | 71.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 2.68 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | 15.96 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.69 | 47.91 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.20 | 40.89 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers