Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCEBX vs LSHCX
GCEBX vs LSHCX Comparison
Open Charts GCEBX vs LSHCX
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income A
Price$10.18
Change+$0.06 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.26M
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
Price$24.99
Change+$0.59 (+2.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.82M
GCEBX vs LSHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCEBX has more cash in the bank: 38.3M vs. LSHCX (29.8M). GCEBX pays higher dividends than LSHCX: GCEBX (1.44) vs LSHCX (0.28). GCEBX was incepted earlier than LSHCX: GCEBX (5 years) vs LSHCX (18 years). LSHCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than GCEBX (1.79). GCEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. LSHCX (6.00). GCEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSHCX: GCEBX (1000) vs LSHCX (2500). GCEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. LSHCX (-1.30). LSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 190.55 vs. GCEBX (-4.22).
| GCEBX | LSHCX | GCEBX / LSHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.29 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 2.56 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.479 | -13.410 | -197% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.3M | 29.8M | 129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.28 | 508% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | -1.30 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.52 | 36.32 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.22 | 190.55 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 197.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement