Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCEBX vs GLFOX
GCEBX vs GLFOX Comparison
Open Charts GCEBX vs GLFOX
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income A
Price$11.27
Change-$0.42 (-3.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.53M
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Open
Price$18.22
Change-$0.06 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.02B
GCEBX vs GLFOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCEBX vs. GLFOX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCEBX is a Hold and GLFOX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLFOX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. GCEBX (42.5M). GLFOX pays higher dividends than GCEBX: GLFOX (2.47) vs GCEBX (1.27). GCEBX was incepted earlier than GLFOX: GCEBX (5 years) vs GLFOX (16 years). GCEBX (1.79) is less costly to investors than GLFOX (1.22). GCEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. GLFOX (36.00). GCEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLFOX: GCEBX (1000) vs GLFOX (2500). GCEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.45 vs. GLFOX (18.64). GLFOX return over 5 years is better than : 43.54 vs. GCEBX (-2.73).
| GCEBX | GLFOX | GCEBX / GLFOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.22 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.22 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.239 | 18.989 | 238% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.5M | 11B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 2.47 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.45 | 18.64 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.63 | 26.89 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.73 | 43.54 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement