Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCEBX vs GLFOX
GCEBX vs GLFOX Comparison
Open Charts GCEBX vs GLFOX
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income A
Price$11.04
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.36M
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Open
Price$18.17
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.84B
GCEBX vs GLFOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCEBX vs. GLFOX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCEBX is a Hold and GLFOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLFOX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. GCEBX (40.4M). GLFOX pays higher dividends than GCEBX: GLFOX (2.53) vs GCEBX (1.39). GCEBX was incepted earlier than GLFOX: GCEBX (5 years) vs GLFOX (16 years). GCEBX (1.79) is less costly to investors than GLFOX (1.22). GCEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. GLFOX (36.00). GCEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLFOX: GCEBX (1000) vs GLFOX (2500). GCEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.76 vs. GLFOX (13.84). GLFOX return over 5 years is better than : 51.26 vs. GCEBX (-7.05).
| GCEBX | GLFOX | GCEBX / GLFOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.22 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.22 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.412 | 18.143 | 206% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4M | 10.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 2.53 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.76 | 13.84 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.72 | 37.25 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.05 | 51.26 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement