GCCFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.32M
MUNMF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
17.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCCFF vs MUNMF

Header iconGCCFF vs MUNMF Comparison
Open Charts GCCFF vs MUNMFBanner chart's image
Golden Cariboo Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$49K
Capitalization3.32M
Mundoro Capital
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.13K
Capitalization17.2M
GCCFF vs MUNMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCCFF vs. MUNMF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCCFF is a Hold and MUNMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GCCFF: $0.04 vs. MUNMF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: GCCFF and MUNMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCCFF: 182% vs. MUNMF: 38%
Market capitalization -- GCCFF: $3.32M vs. MUNMF: $17.2M
GCCFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.32M. MUNMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $17.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCCFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMUNMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GCCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MUNMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MUNMF is a better buy in the long-term than GCCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCCFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUNMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCCFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MUNMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCCFF is a better buy in the short-term than MUNMF.

Price Growth

GCCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.34% price change this week, while MUNMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.88% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUNMF($17.2M) has a higher market cap than GCCFF($3.32M). MUNMF YTD gains are higher at: 42.491 vs. GCCFF (-54.889). MUNMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.52M vs. GCCFF (-5.38M). MUNMF has more cash in the bank: 5.17M vs. GCCFF (337K). GCCFF (0) and MUNMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GCCFFMUNMFGCCFF / MUNMF
Capitalization3.32M17.2M19%
EBITDA-5.38M-2.52M213%
Gain YTD-54.88942.491-129%
P/E RatioN/A15.95-
Revenue00-
Total Cash337K5.17M7%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCCFF vs MUNMF: Fundamental Ratings
GCCFF
MUNMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8482
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10061
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9568
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GCCFF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as MUNMF (71). This means that GCCFF’s stock grew similarly to MUNMF’s over the last 12 months.

MUNMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCCFF (100). This means that MUNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

MUNMF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (100). This means that MUNMF’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

MUNMF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCCFF (96). This means that MUNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

MUNMF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (95). This means that MUNMF’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCCFFMUNMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHAR11.650.27
+2.37%
Pharming Group NV
NCEW0.790.01
+1.33%
New Century Logistics (BVI) Ltd
PUK26.66-0.30
-1.11%
Prudential PLC
BVFL16.25-0.19
-1.16%
BV Financial
CAMT83.94-3.11
-3.57%
Camtek Ltd

GCCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCCFF and FEOVF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCCFF and FEOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCCFF
1D Price
Change %
GCCFF100%
+24.90%
FEOVF - GCCFF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MUNMF - GCCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
GARWF - GCCFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
FSUGY - GCCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
FTMDF - GCCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
More

MUNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MUNMF and THSGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MUNMF and THSGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUNMF
1D Price
Change %
MUNMF100%
+0.81%
THSGF - MUNMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.72%
LZM - MUNMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
GCCFF - MUNMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+24.90%
TMQ - MUNMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.69%
PUTKY - MUNMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More