GCAAF
Price
$47.74
Change
+$0.32 (+0.67%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAIN
Price
$58.90
Change
-$0.24 (-0.41%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.28B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCAAF vs MAIN

Header iconGCAAF vs MAIN Comparison
Open Charts GCAAF vs MAINBanner chart's image
Guardian Capital Group
Price$47.74
Change+$0.32 (+0.67%)
Volume$375
Capitalization1.18B
Main Street Capital
Price$58.90
Change-$0.24 (-0.41%)
Volume$348.39K
Capitalization5.28B
GCAAF vs MAIN Comparison Chart in %
GCAAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCAAF vs. MAIN commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCAAF is a Hold and MAIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (GCAAF: $47.74 vs. MAIN: $58.90)
Brand notoriety: GCAAF and MAIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCAAF: 8% vs. MAIN: 57%
Market capitalization -- GCAAF: $1.18B vs. MAIN: $5.28B
GCAAF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.18B. MAIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCAAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GCAAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MAIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GCAAF and MAIN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCAAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCAAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the short-term than GCAAF.

Price Growth

GCAAF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while MAIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.57% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($5.28B) has a higher market cap than GCAAF($1.18B). GCAAF has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: GCAAF (10.83) vs MAIN (9.75). GCAAF YTD gains are higher at: 67.740 vs. MAIN (7.456). GCAAF has less debt than MAIN: GCAAF (179M) vs MAIN (2.22B). MAIN has higher revenues than GCAAF: MAIN (623M) vs GCAAF (398M).
GCAAFMAINGCAAF / MAIN
Capitalization1.18B5.28B22%
EBITDA200MN/A-
Gain YTD67.7407.456909%
P/E Ratio10.839.75111%
Revenue398M623M64%
Total Cash170MN/A-
Total Debt179M2.22B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCAAF vs MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
GCAAF
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9319
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2710
SMR RATING
1..100
6316
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3241
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAIN's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (23). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (27). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCAAF (63). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (50). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (41). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCAAFMAIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCAAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCVEX23.060.06
+0.26%
Hartford Schroders International Stk A
SECAX11.990.03
+0.25%
SEI Small Cap II A (SIIT)
QNTAX41.280.03
+0.07%
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
MAPTX22.90N/A
N/A
Matthews Pacific Tiger Investor
OCLGX15.75-0.04
-0.25%
Optimum Large Cap Growth C

GCAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCAAF and AGFMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCAAF and AGFMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCAAF
1D Price
Change %
GCAAF100%
N/A
AGFMF - GCAAF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
MAIN - GCAAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
HTGC - GCAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
GBLBY - GCAAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
HALFF - GCAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
-0.14%
ARCC - MAIN
82%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
HTGC - MAIN
79%
Closely correlated
-1.67%
BCSF - MAIN
77%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
GBDC - MAIN
77%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
FDUS - MAIN
76%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
More