GCAAF
Price
$27.94
Change
-$0.72 (-2.51%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
MAIN
Price
$56.40
Change
+$0.49 (+0.88%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GCAAF vs MAIN

Header iconGCAAF vs MAIN Comparison
Open Charts GCAAF vs MAINBanner chart's image
Guardian Capital Group
Price$27.94
Change-$0.72 (-2.51%)
Volume$372
CapitalizationN/A
Main Street Capital
Price$56.40
Change+$0.49 (+0.88%)
Volume$754.5K
CapitalizationN/A
GCAAF vs MAIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCAAF vs. MAIN commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCAAF is a Hold and MAIN is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (GCAAF: $27.94 vs. MAIN: $56.40)
Brand notoriety: GCAAF and MAIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCAAF: 44% vs. MAIN: 194%
Market capitalization -- GCAAF: $905.93M vs. MAIN: $4.02B
GCAAF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $905.93M. MAIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCAAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GCAAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than GCAAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MAIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GCAAF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.81% price change this week, while MAIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.02B) has a higher market cap than GCAAF($906M). GCAAF has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: GCAAF (12.09) vs MAIN (8.97). MAIN YTD gains are higher at: 41.819 vs. GCAAF (-17.318). GCAAF has less debt than MAIN: GCAAF (159M) vs MAIN (1.8B). MAIN has higher revenues than GCAAF: MAIN (510M) vs GCAAF (255M).
GCAAFMAINGCAAF / MAIN
Capitalization906M4.02B23%
EBITDA141MN/A-
Gain YTD-17.31841.819-41%
P/E Ratio12.098.97135%
Revenue255M510M50%
Total Cash139MN/A-
Total Debt159M1.8B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCAAF vs MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
GCAAF
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5032
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5722
SMR RATING
1..100
1812
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9640
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GCAAF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (34). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCAAF (57). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (18). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCAAF (74). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCAAF (96). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X97224.730000-531.203100
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

GCAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCAAF and GMPXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCAAF and GMPXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCAAF
1D Price
Change %
GCAAF100%
-2.52%
GMPXF - GCAAF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGFMF - GCAAF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
HTGC - GCAAF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
MAIN - GCAAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
HALFF - GCAAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with HTGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then HTGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
+1.42%
HTGC - MAIN
68%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
ARCC - MAIN
67%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
CSWC - MAIN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
FSK - MAIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
BXSL - MAIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
More