GCAAF
Price
$47.74
Change
+$0.32 (+0.67%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HTGC
Price
$17.55
Change
-$0.10 (-0.57%)
Updated
Nov 14, 11:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.21B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCAAF vs HTGC

Header iconGCAAF vs HTGC Comparison
Open Charts GCAAF vs HTGCBanner chart's image
Guardian Capital Group
Price$47.74
Change+$0.32 (+0.67%)
Volume$375
Capitalization1.18B
Hercules Capital
Price$17.55
Change-$0.10 (-0.57%)
Volume$605
Capitalization3.21B
GCAAF vs HTGC Comparison Chart in %
GCAAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HTGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCAAF vs. HTGC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCAAF is a Hold and HTGC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (GCAAF: $47.74 vs. HTGC: $17.66)
Brand notoriety: GCAAF and HTGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCAAF: 8% vs. HTGC: 117%
Market capitalization -- GCAAF: $1.18B vs. HTGC: $3.21B
GCAAF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.18B. HTGC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCAAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHTGC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • GCAAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HTGC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GCAAF and HTGC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCAAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HTGC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCAAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HTGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the short-term than GCAAF.

Price Growth

GCAAF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while HTGC (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.57% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HTGC($3.21B) has a higher market cap than GCAAF($1.18B). GCAAF has higher P/E ratio than HTGC: GCAAF (10.83) vs HTGC (10.15). GCAAF YTD gains are higher at: 68.872 vs. HTGC (-5.382). GCAAF has more cash in the bank: 170M vs. HTGC (51.2M). GCAAF has less debt than HTGC: GCAAF (179M) vs HTGC (2.08B). GCAAF has higher revenues than HTGC: GCAAF (398M) vs HTGC (350M).
GCAAFHTGCGCAAF / HTGC
Capitalization1.18B3.21B37%
EBITDA200MN/A-
Gain YTD68.872-5.382-1,280%
P/E Ratio10.8310.15107%
Revenue398M350M114%
Total Cash170M51.2M332%
Total Debt179M2.08B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCAAF vs HTGC: Fundamental Ratings
GCAAF
HTGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9384
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2619
SMR RATING
1..100
6318
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3232
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7527

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HTGC's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (23). This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (26). This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCAAF (63). This means that HTGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HTGC (58). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to HTGC’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as HTGC (32). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to HTGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCAAFHTGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCAAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HTGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LFEIX24.55-0.12
-0.49%
Federated Hermes Strategic Div Gr F
SCIEX21.97-0.33
-1.48%
Hartford Schroders International Stk I
NMUCX10.61-0.17
-1.58%
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
BRMAX15.81-0.28
-1.74%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Inv A
GCEDX11.29-0.43
-3.67%
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Ins

GCAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCAAF and AGFMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCAAF and AGFMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCAAF
1D Price
Change %
GCAAF100%
+0.67%
AGFMF - GCAAF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
MAIN - GCAAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
HTGC - GCAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
GBLBY - GCAAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GCAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
More

HTGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTGC has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTGC jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTGC
1D Price
Change %
HTGC100%
-0.23%
MAIN - HTGC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
ARCC - HTGC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
GSBD - HTGC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
OBDC - HTGC
77%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
CSWC - HTGC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
More