GCAAF
Price
$49.24
Change
-$0.26 (-0.53%)
Updated
Feb 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.21B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HALFF
Price
$185.75
Change
+$3.25 (+1.78%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
16.66B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCAAF vs HALFF

Header iconGCAAF vs HALFF Comparison
Open Charts GCAAF vs HALFFBanner chart's image
Guardian Capital Group
Price$49.24
Change-$0.26 (-0.53%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.21B
Hal Trust
Price$185.75
Change+$3.25 (+1.78%)
Volume$1.02K
Capitalization16.66B
GCAAF vs HALFF Comparison Chart in %
GCAAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HALFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCAAF vs. HALFF commentary
Feb 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCAAF is a Hold and HALFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 03, 2026
Stock price -- (GCAAF: $49.50 vs. HALFF: $185.75)
Brand notoriety: GCAAF and HALFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCAAF: 28% vs. HALFF: 435%
Market capitalization -- GCAAF: $1.21B vs. HALFF: $16.66B
GCAAF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.21B. HALFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $16.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $173.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCAAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHALFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GCAAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HALFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCAAF is a better buy in the long-term than HALFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCAAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HALFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCAAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HALFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HALFF is a better buy in the short-term than GCAAF.

Price Growth

GCAAF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.96% price change this week, while HALFF (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.99% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HALFF($16.7B) has a higher market cap than GCAAF($1.21B). GCAAF has higher P/E ratio than HALFF: GCAAF (8.98) vs HALFF (8.22). HALFF YTD gains are higher at: 11.898 vs. GCAAF (0.306). HALFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.92B vs. GCAAF (239M). HALFF has more cash in the bank: 4.04B vs. GCAAF (222M). GCAAF has less debt than HALFF: GCAAF (175M) vs HALFF (4.8B). HALFF has higher revenues than GCAAF: HALFF (13.1B) vs GCAAF (392M).
GCAAFHALFFGCAAF / HALFF
Capitalization1.21B16.7B7%
EBITDA239M3.92B6%
Gain YTD0.30611.8983%
P/E Ratio8.988.22109%
Revenue392M13.1B3%
Total Cash222M4.04B5%
Total Debt175M4.8B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCAAF vs HALFF: Fundamental Ratings
GCAAF
HALFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2661
SMR RATING
1..100
5792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7279
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GCAAF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as HALFF (21). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HALFF (61). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HALFF (92). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as HALFF (42). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as HALFF (79). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCAAFHALFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
33%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCAAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HALFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REK17.020.20
+1.19%
ProShares Short Real Estate
ELFY38.070.13
+0.33%
ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF
NMI9.990.02
+0.25%
Nuveen Municipal Income
EMLC26.210.03
+0.12%
VanEck JPMorgan EMLcl Ccy Bd ETF
CONY31.53-1.02
-3.13%
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF

GCAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCAAF and AGFMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCAAF and AGFMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCAAF
1D Price
Change %
GCAAF100%
-0.53%
AGFMF - GCAAF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
MAIN - GCAAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
HTGC - GCAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
GBLBY - GCAAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
HALFF - GCAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HALFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HALFF and IVSBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HALFF and IVSBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HALFF
1D Price
Change %
HALFF100%
N/A
IVSBF - HALFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
CG - HALFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
TROW - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
BUR - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
SEIC - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More