Advertisement
GBTG vs WALD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBTG is a Hold and WALD is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GBTG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WALD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GBTG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- WALD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
| GBTG | WALD | GBTG / WALD | |
| Capitalization | 2.84B | 794M | 357% |
| EBITDA | 190M | -17.21M | -1,104% |
| Gain YTD | -30.280 | -29.851 | 101% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.29B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 476M | 99.7K | 477,432% |
| Total Debt | 1.43B | 2.1M | 68,286% |
| GBTG | WALD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 41% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 66% | 20 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | N/A |
Advertisement
GBTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBTG has been loosely correlated with YOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBTG jumps, then YOU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBTG | 100% | +1.89% | ||
| YOU - GBTG | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| QLYS - GBTG | 39% Loosely correlated | +4.23% | ||
| ALRM - GBTG | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| ADSK - GBTG | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| CSGS - GBTG | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
More | ||||
WALD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WALD and SOS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WALD and SOS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WALD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WALD | 100% | +3.68% | ||
| SOS - WALD | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| GBTG - WALD | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
| AFRM - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
| RXT - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.76% | ||
| BTDR - WALD | 23% Poorly correlated | +5.28% | ||
More | ||||