GBLBF
Price
$66.50
Change
-$1.80 (-2.64%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
WNMLA
Price
$4.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
Ad is loading...

GBLBF vs WNMLA

Header iconGBLBF vs WNMLA Comparison
Open Charts GBLBF vs WNMLABanner chart's image
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
Price$66.50
Change-$1.80 (-2.64%)
Volume$1.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Winmill & Co
Price$4.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8K
CapitalizationN/A
GBLBF vs WNMLA Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBLBF vs. WNMLA commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBLBF is a Hold and WNMLA is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (GBLBF: $66.50 vs. WNMLA: $4.30)
Brand notoriety: GBLBF and WNMLA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBLBF: 37% vs. WNMLA: 185%
Market capitalization -- GBLBF: $11.08B vs. WNMLA: $3.45M
GBLBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $11.08B. WNMLA’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBLBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWNMLA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GBLBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WNMLA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GBLBF and WNMLA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GBLBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.62% price change this week, while WNMLA (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBLBF($11.1B) has a higher market cap than WNMLA($3.45M). WNMLA YTD gains are higher at: 14.667 vs. GBLBF (-15.823).
GBLBFWNMLAGBLBF / WNMLA
Capitalization11.1B3.45M321,739%
EBITDA676MN/A-
Gain YTD-15.82314.667-108%
P/E Ratio47.39N/A-
Revenue9BN/A-
Total Cash3.3BN/A-
Total Debt7.81BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBLBF vs WNMLA: Fundamental Ratings
GBLBF
WNMLA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
90100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
175

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBLBF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as WNMLA (35). This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to WNMLA’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WNMLA (100). This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to WNMLA’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as WNMLA (100). This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to WNMLA’s over the last 12 months.

WNMLA's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as GBLBF (75). This means that WNMLA’s stock grew similarly to GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WNMLA (100). This means that GBLBF’s stock grew significantly faster than WNMLA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

GBLBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLBF and FNCSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLBF and FNCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBLBF
1D Price
Change %
GBLBF100%
N/A
FNCSF - GBLBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IOOFF - GBLBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNMLA - GBLBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCMG - GBLBF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
JFHHF - GBLBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WNMLA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WNMLA and HALFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WNMLA and HALFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WNMLA
1D Price
Change %
WNMLA100%
N/A
HALFF - WNMLA
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBLBF - WNMLA
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNDLF - WNMLA
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFHHF - WNMLA
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STEP - WNMLA
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
More