Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBFAX vs RNWHX
GBFAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GBFAX vs RNWHX
VanEck Emerging Markets A
Price$18.71
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.92M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$98.37
Change-$0.17 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.7B
GBFAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBFAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBFAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 79.7B vs. GBFAX (353M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GBFAX: RNWHX (1.25) vs GBFAX (0.60). GBFAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GBFAX (32 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GBFAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GBFAX (19.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBFAX: RNWHX (250) vs GBFAX (1000). GBFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.89 vs. RNWHX (25.18). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 8.43 vs. GBFAX (-16.09).
| GBFAX | RNWHX | GBFAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.287 | 7.005 | 133% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 79.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.25 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.89 | 25.18 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.91 | 45.42 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.09 | 8.43 | -191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.53 | 128.69 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers