Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBFAX vs RNWBX
GBFAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GBFAX vs RNWBX
VanEck Emerging Markets A
Price$17.12
Change+$0.14 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.55M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
GBFAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBFAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBFAX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GBFAX (322M). GBFAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GBFAX (0.72) vs RNWBX (0.12). GBFAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GBFAX (32 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) and GBFAX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GBFAX (19.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBFAX: RNWBX (250) vs GBFAX (1000). GBFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.38 vs. RNWBX (19.18). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. GBFAX (-10.98).
| GBFAX | RNWBX | GBFAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.403 | 20.884 | 141% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.12 | 612% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.38 | 19.18 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.26 | 41.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.98 | 7.90 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.37 | 82.81 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers