Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBFAX vs RNWBX
GBFAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GBFAX vs RNWBX
VanEck Emerging Markets A
Price$18.71
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.92M
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.83
Change-$0.16 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.7B
GBFAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBFAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBFAX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 79.7B vs. GBFAX (353M). GBFAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GBFAX (0.60) vs RNWBX (0.45). GBFAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GBFAX (32 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) and GBFAX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GBFAX (19.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBFAX: RNWBX (250) vs GBFAX (1000). GBFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.89 vs. RNWBX (23.79). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 3.90 vs. GBFAX (-16.09).
| GBFAX | RNWBX | GBFAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.66 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.66 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.287 | 6.875 | 135% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 79.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.45 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.89 | 23.79 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.91 | 40.91 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.09 | 3.90 | -412% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.53 | 118.47 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers