GBDC
Price
$14.77
Change
+$0.10 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.84B
36 days until earnings call
WHF
Price
$9.13
Change
+$0.10 (+1.11%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
283.1M
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GBDC vs WHF

Header iconGBDC vs WHF Comparison
Open Charts GBDC vs WHFBanner chart's image
Golub Capital BDC
Price$14.77
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
Volume$669K
Capitalization2.84B
WhiteHorse Finance
Price$9.13
Change+$0.10 (+1.11%)
Volume$147.57K
Capitalization283.1M
GBDC vs WHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GBDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBDC vs. WHF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBDC is a Buy and WHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GBDC: $14.77 vs. WHF: $9.13)
Brand notoriety: GBDC and WHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBDC: 49% vs. WHF: 175%
Market capitalization -- GBDC: $2.84B vs. WHF: $283.1M
GBDC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.84B. WHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $283.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBDC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GBDC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBDC is a better buy in the long-term than WHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBDC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBDC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GBDC and WHF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GBDC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.21% price change this week, while WHF (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

GBDC is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

WHF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBDC($2.84B) has a higher market cap than WHF($283M). WHF has higher P/E ratio than GBDC: WHF (13.84) vs GBDC (9.09). GBDC YTD gains are higher at: 2.543 vs. WHF (2.134). WHF has less debt than GBDC: WHF (386M) vs GBDC (3.07B). GBDC has higher revenues than WHF: GBDC (334M) vs WHF (25.7M).
GBDCWHFGBDC / WHF
Capitalization2.84B283M1,002%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.5432.134119%
P/E Ratio9.0913.8466%
Revenue334M25.7M1,300%
Total Cash65.6MN/A-
Total Debt3.07B386M794%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBDC vs WHF: Fundamental Ratings
GBDC
WHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1034
SMR RATING
1..100
1261
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5557
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1216
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as GBDC (9). This means that WHF’s stock grew similarly to GBDC’s over the last 12 months.

GBDC's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as WHF (34). This means that GBDC’s stock grew similarly to WHF’s over the last 12 months.

GBDC's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHF (61). This means that GBDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHF’s over the last 12 months.

GBDC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as WHF (57). This means that GBDC’s stock grew similarly to WHF’s over the last 12 months.

GBDC's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as WHF (16). This means that GBDC’s stock grew similarly to WHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBDCWHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GBDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACNDF0.860.03
+4.11%
Ascendas India Trust
FNLPF20.080.43
+2.16%
Fresnillo Plc
EREPF0.03N/A
N/A
Zonte Metals, Inc.
KUASF8.12N/A
N/A
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
BCEKF0.15N/A
-1.85%
Bear Creek Mining Corp.

GBDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBDC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GBDC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBDC
1D Price
Change %
GBDC100%
+0.68%
ARCC - GBDC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
FDUS - GBDC
80%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
FSK - GBDC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
SLRC - GBDC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
MAIN - GBDC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
More

WHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHF has been loosely correlated with PSEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHF jumps, then PSEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHF
1D Price
Change %
WHF100%
+1.11%
PSEC - WHF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BCSF - WHF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
CGBD - WHF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
FDUS - WHF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
GBDC - WHF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
More