Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCIX vs RMFCX
GBCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
Price$18.34
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.13M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
GBCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GBCIX (21.1M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMFCX (1.26) vs GBCIX (0.82). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCIX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GBCIX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCIX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. GBCIX (9.01). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.17 vs. GBCIX (9.99).
| GBCIX | RMFCX | GBCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 0.91 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.499 | 2.091 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.26 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.01 | 11.33 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.51 | 28.04 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.99 | 44.17 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.06 | 109.86 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement