Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFEX
GBCCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$16.16
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.31M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.60
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.34B
GBCCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. GBCCX (20.3M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFEX (1.43) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.83 vs. GBCCX (-4.49). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.19 vs. GBCCX (6.80).
| GBCCX | RMFEX | GBCCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.62 | 444% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.62 | 548% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.305 | 15.285 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.3M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.49 | 5.83 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.03 | 28.26 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.80 | 55.19 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.15 | 97.17 | -6% |