Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFCX
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$15.74
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.51M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GBCCX (19.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFCX (1.24) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. GBCCX (1.02). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. GBCCX (14.77).
| GBCCX | RMFCX | GBCCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.91 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.91 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.434 | 11.421 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.5M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.02 | 7.71 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.30 | 32.16 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.77 | 56.41 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.84 | 91.12 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement