Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFCX
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$15.92
Change-$0.19 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.85M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GBCCX (19.9M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFCX (1.21) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. GBCCX (-2.72). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. GBCCX (11.18).
| GBCCX | RMFCX | GBCCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.91 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.91 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.815 | 15.093 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.9M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.72 | 6.67 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.72 | 30.56 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.18 | 54.90 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.76 | 94.04 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement