Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFCX
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$15.51
Change-$0.33 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.34M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GBCCX (21.3M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFCX (1.24) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. GBCCX (4.80). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. GBCCX (0.32).
| GBCCX | RMFCX | GBCCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.91 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.91 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.727 | 2.244 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.80 | 7.45 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.08 | 28.73 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.32 | 44.16 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.48 | 105.79 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement