Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFCX
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$16.91
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.96M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GBCCX (21M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFCX (1.18) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. GBCCX (4.06). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.19 vs. GBCCX (10.52).
| GBCCX | RMFCX | GBCCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.91 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.91 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.417 | 9.715 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.06 | 7.94 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.34 | 28.72 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.52 | 46.19 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.55 | 90.34 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement