Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMEBX
GBCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMEBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$15.92
Change-$0.19 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.85M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
GBCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GBCCX (19.9M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMEBX (1.05) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. GBCCX (-2.72). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. GBCCX (11.18).
| GBCCX | RMEBX | GBCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 1.07 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 1.07 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.815 | 14.940 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.9M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.72 | 6.55 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.72 | 30.03 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.18 | 53.80 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.76 | 92.20 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement