Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFEX
GBCAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.45
Change-$0.36 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.34M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.55
Change-$1.72 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
GBCAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GBCAX (21.3M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFEX (1.50) vs GBCAX (0.00). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. GBCAX (5.55). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 46.45 vs. GBCAX (5.76).
| GBCAX | RMFEX | GBCAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.62 | 427% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.770 | 2.280 | 209% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 7.80 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.42 | 29.96 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.76 | 46.45 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.99 | 114.19 | 19% |