Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFCX
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$20.12
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.98M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GBCAX (21M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFCX (1.18) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. GBCAX (5.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. GBCAX (17.08).
| GBCAX | RMFCX | GBCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.91 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.336 | 9.696 | 199% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.18 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.14 | 8.05 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.18 | 28.89 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.08 | 46.17 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.29 | 91.60 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement