Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFCX
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.45
Change-$0.36 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.34M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GBCAX (21.3M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFCX (1.24) vs GBCAX (0.00). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. GBCAX (5.55). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. GBCAX (5.76).
| GBCAX | RMFCX | GBCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.91 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.770 | 2.244 | 213% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 7.45 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.42 | 28.73 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.76 | 44.16 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.99 | 105.79 | 21% |