GBBYF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
278.65M
THLPF
Price
$29.20
Change
+$1.48 (+5.34%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GBBYF vs THLPF

Header iconGBBYF vs THLPF Comparison
Open Charts GBBYF vs THLPFBanner chart's image
Goodbaby International Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization278.65M
Thule Group AB
Price$29.20
Change+$1.48 (+5.34%)
Volume$573
Capitalization2.64B
GBBYF vs THLPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
THLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBBYF vs. THLPF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBBYF is a Hold and THLPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GBBYF: $0.17 vs. THLPF: $29.20)
Brand notoriety: GBBYF and THLPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBBYF: 100% vs. THLPF: 103%
Market capitalization -- GBBYF: $278.65M vs. THLPF: $2.64B
GBBYF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $278.65M. THLPF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $2.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $38.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBBYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTHLPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GBBYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • THLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBBYF is a better buy in the long-term than THLPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

THLPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • THLPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

GBBYF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while THLPF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-0.99% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
THLPF($2.64B) has a higher market cap than GBBYF($279M). THLPF has higher P/E ratio than GBBYF: THLPF (28.34) vs GBBYF (6.35). GBBYF YTD gains are higher at: 69.492 vs. THLPF (-8.750).
GBBYFTHLPFGBBYF / THLPF
Capitalization279M2.64B11%
EBITDAN/A1.57B-
Gain YTD69.492-8.750-794%
P/E Ratio6.3528.3422%
RevenueN/A10.1B-
Total CashN/A357M-
Total DebtN/A4.48B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBBYF vs THLPF: Fundamental Ratings
GBBYF
THLPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7588
SMR RATING
1..100
8954
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1537
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5028

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBBYF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as THLPF (20). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to THLPF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as THLPF (88). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to THLPF’s over the last 12 months.

THLPF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBBYF (89). This means that THLPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBYF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as THLPF (61). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to THLPF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBYF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as THLPF (37). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to THLPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBBYFTHLPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
THLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGLAX14.610.15
+1.04%
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
LMPFX114.130.73
+0.64%
ClearBridge Growth FI
SMRPX10.660.06
+0.57%
Westwood Salient MLP & Engy Infras Ultr
FNPFX73.200.39
+0.54%
American Funds New Perspective F3
PMIEX25.930.11
+0.43%
Federated Hermes International Equity A

GBBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBBYF and THLPF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBBYF and THLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBBYF
1D Price
Change %
GBBYF100%
N/A
THLPF - GBBYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDY - GBBYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
CUKPF - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GYYMF - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KENS - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

THLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that THLPF and GBBYF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that THLPF and GBBYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THLPF
1D Price
Change %
THLPF100%
N/A
GBBYF - THLPF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHMDF - THLPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMNNY - THLPF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
YAMCF - THLPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYHOF - THLPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More