GBBYF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
121.94M
GMWKF
Price
$216.32
Change
+$0.32 (+0.15%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GBBYF vs GMWKF

Header iconGBBYF vs GMWKF Comparison
Open Charts GBBYF vs GMWKFBanner chart's image
Goodbaby International Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization121.94M
Games Workshop Group
Price$216.32
Change+$0.32 (+0.15%)
Volume$152
Capitalization4.93B
GBBYF vs GMWKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GBBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMWKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBBYF vs. GMWKF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBBYF is a Hold and GMWKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GBBYF: $0.17 vs. GMWKF: $216.32)
Brand notoriety: GBBYF and GMWKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBBYF: 9% vs. GMWKF: 27%
Market capitalization -- GBBYF: $121.94M vs. GMWKF: $4.93B
GBBYF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $121.94M. GMWKF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $4.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBBYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGMWKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GBBYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GMWKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMWKF is a better buy in the long-term than GBBYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBBYF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMWKF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBBYF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GMWKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GBBYF is a better buy in the short-term than GMWKF.

Price Growth

GBBYF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GMWKF (@Recreational Products) price change was -2.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+3.99% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMWKF($4.93B) has a higher market cap than GBBYF($122M). GBBYF has higher P/E ratio than GMWKF: GBBYF (102.04) vs GMWKF (28.09). GBBYF YTD gains are higher at: 69.492 vs. GMWKF (21.528). GBBYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 703M vs. GMWKF (211M). GBBYF has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. GMWKF (90.2M). GMWKF has less debt than GBBYF: GMWKF (49.9M) vs GBBYF (3.82B). GBBYF has higher revenues than GMWKF: GBBYF (9.69B) vs GMWKF (471M).
GBBYFGMWKFGBBYF / GMWKF
Capitalization122M4.93B2%
EBITDA703M211M333%
Gain YTD69.49221.528323%
P/E Ratio102.0428.09363%
Revenue9.69B471M2,058%
Total Cash1.11B90.2M1,225%
Total Debt3.82B49.9M7,651%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBBYF vs GMWKF: Fundamental Ratings
GBBYF
GMWKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7235
SMR RATING
1..100
8717
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1732
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBBYF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as GMWKF (36). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to GMWKF’s over the last 12 months.

GMWKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBBYF (72). This means that GMWKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GMWKF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GBBYF (87). This means that GMWKF’s stock grew significantly faster than GBBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBYF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GMWKF (42). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to GMWKF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBYF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as GMWKF (32). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to GMWKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBBYFGMWKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GBBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMWKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSXCX49.040.42
+0.86%
Calvert US Large Cap Core Rspnb Idx C
HIGCX20.190.11
+0.55%
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income C
WCMAX11.820.05
+0.42%
WCM Mid Cap Quality Value Institutional
CREEX9.630.01
+0.10%
Columbia Real Estate Equity Inst
VARBX10.930.01
+0.09%
First Trust Merger Arbitrage Cl I

GBBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBBYF and THLPF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBBYF and THLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBBYF
1D Price
Change %
GBBYF100%
N/A
THLPF - GBBYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDY - GBBYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
CUKPF - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
GYYMF - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KENS - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
+152.94%
More

GMWKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMWKF and CUKPF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMWKF and CUKPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMWKF
1D Price
Change %
GMWKF100%
+0.15%
CUKPF - GMWKF
7%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
GBBYF - GMWKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOCIF - GMWKF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KENS - GMWKF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+152.94%
CLKXF - GMWKF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More