GBBFF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.83M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STLRF
Price
$1.36
Change
+$0.08 (+6.25%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
193.49M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GBBFF vs STLRF

Header iconGBBFF vs STLRF Comparison
Open Charts GBBFF vs STLRFBanner chart's image
Granada Gold Mine
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.97K
Capitalization4.83M
STLLR GOLD
Price$1.36
Change+$0.08 (+6.25%)
Volume$40.89K
Capitalization193.49M
GBBFF vs STLRF Comparison Chart in %
GBBFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STLRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBBFF vs. STLRF commentary
Dec 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBBFF is a Hold and STLRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GBBFF: $0.03 vs. STLRF: $1.36)
Brand notoriety: GBBFF and STLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBBFF: 3% vs. STLRF: 104%
Market capitalization -- GBBFF: $4.83M vs. STLRF: $193.49M
GBBFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.83M. STLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $193.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $125.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBBFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GBBFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GBBFF and STLRF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBBFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLRF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBBFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STLRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STLRF is a better buy in the short-term than GBBFF.

Price Growth

GBBFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +12.16% price change this week, while STLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.32% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STLRF($193M) has a higher market cap than GBBFF($4.83M). STLRF YTD gains are higher at: 136.936 vs. GBBFF (66.000). GBBFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.59M vs. STLRF (-31.25M). STLRF has more cash in the bank: 11.5M vs. GBBFF (103K). STLRF has less debt than GBBFF: STLRF (1.22M) vs GBBFF (1.53M). GBBFF (0) and STLRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GBBFFSTLRFGBBFF / STLRF
Capitalization4.83M193M3%
EBITDA-1.59M-31.25M5%
Gain YTD66.000136.93648%
P/E RatioN/A1.40-
Revenue00-
Total Cash103K11.5M1%
Total Debt1.53M1.22M126%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBBFF vs STLRF: Fundamental Ratings
GBBFF
STLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10094
SMR RATING
1..100
10096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2218
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBBFF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (45). This means that GBBFF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

STLRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBFF (100). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to GBBFF’s over the last 12 months.

STLRF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBFF (100). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to GBBFF’s over the last 12 months.

STLRF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBFF (41). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to GBBFF’s over the last 12 months.

STLRF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBFF (22). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to GBBFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBBFFSTLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GBBFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STLRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STBFY15.300.10
+0.66%
Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd
CEVIY5.15N/A
N/A
China Everbright IHD Pacific Ltd,
NOWVF0.18N/A
N/A
NowVertical Group Inc.
TOYOF21.56-0.19
-0.90%
Toyota Motor Corp.
LLKKF0.08N/A
-2.69%
Lake Resources N.L.

GBBFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBBFF and STLRF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBBFF and STLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBBFF
1D Price
Change %
GBBFF100%
N/A
STLRF - GBBFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.28%
GGLDF - GBBFF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.86%
GFGSF - GBBFF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
GFKRF - GBBFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLBKF - GBBFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More