GB
Price
$5.44
Change
-$0.12 (-2.16%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
7 days until earnings call
LIQQF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

GB vs LIQQF

Header iconGB vs LIQQF Comparison
Open Charts GB vs LIQQFBanner chart's image
Global Blue Group Holding AG
Price$5.44
Change-$0.12 (-2.16%)
Volume$40.87K
CapitalizationN/A
Liquid Meta Capital Holdings
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15K
CapitalizationN/A
GB vs LIQQF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GB vs. LIQQF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GB is a Sell and LIQQF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (GB: $5.44 vs. LIQQF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: GB and LIQQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GB: 97% vs. LIQQF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GB: $1.05B vs. LIQQF: $1.83M
GB [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.05B. LIQQF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIQQF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIQQF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GB is a better buy in the long-term than LIQQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GB (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.64% price change this week, while LIQQF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

GB is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GB($1.05B) has a higher market cap than LIQQF($1.83M). GB YTD gains are higher at: 15.011 vs. LIQQF (0.000). GB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 134M vs. LIQQF (-3.52M). GB has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. LIQQF (15.3M). LIQQF has less debt than GB: LIQQF (7.57K) vs GB (588M). GB has higher revenues than LIQQF: GB (404M) vs LIQQF (1.8M).
GBLIQQFGB / LIQQF
Capitalization1.05B1.83M57,221%
EBITDA134M-3.52M-3,804%
Gain YTD15.0110.000-
P/E Ratio55.05N/A-
Revenue404M1.8M22,407%
Total Cash101M15.3M660%
Total Debt588M7.57K7,771,610%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

GB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GB and NWKLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GB and NWKLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GB
1D Price
Change %
GB100%
-2.16%
NWKLF - GB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LIQQF - GB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OCFT - GB
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.40%
LOQPF - GB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWISF - GB
21%
Poorly correlated
-13.73%
More

LIQQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIQQF has been loosely correlated with FNCHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIQQF jumps, then FNCHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIQQF
1D Price
Change %
LIQQF100%
N/A
FNCHF - LIQQF
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NWKLF - LIQQF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DOTDF - LIQQF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AKAFF - LIQQF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GB - LIQQF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
More