GAYMF
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.05 (-8.77%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
52.59M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RGLD
Price
$185.54
Change
-$3.93 (-2.07%)
Updated
Nov 14, 02:46 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.99B
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GAYMF vs RGLD

Header iconGAYMF vs RGLD Comparison
Open Charts GAYMF vs RGLDBanner chart's image
Galway Metals
Price$0.52
Change-$0.05 (-8.77%)
Volume$132.12K
Capitalization52.59M
Royal Gold
Price$185.54
Change-$3.93 (-2.07%)
Volume$200
Capitalization15.99B
GAYMF vs RGLD Comparison Chart in %
GAYMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RGLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAYMF vs. RGLD commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAYMF is a Hold and RGLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (GAYMF: $0.52 vs. RGLD: $189.47)
Brand notoriety: GAYMF and RGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAYMF: 53% vs. RGLD: 73%
Market capitalization -- GAYMF: $52.59M vs. RGLD: $15.99B
GAYMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $52.59M. RGLD’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $115.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAYMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GAYMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the long-term than GAYMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GAYMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GAYMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RGLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GAYMF is a better buy in the short-term than RGLD.

Price Growth

GAYMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +21.53% price change this week, while RGLD (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8738.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

RGLD is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.30% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLD($16B) has a higher market cap than GAYMF($52.6M). GAYMF (47.182) and RGLD (45.265) have similar YTD gains . RGLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 658M vs. GAYMF (-8.24M). GAYMF has less debt than RGLD: GAYMF (75K) vs RGLD (50M). RGLD has higher revenues than GAYMF: RGLD (799M) vs GAYMF (0).
GAYMFRGLDGAYMF / RGLD
Capitalization52.6M16B0%
EBITDA-8.24M658M-1%
Gain YTD47.18245.265104%
P/E RatioN/A26.03-
Revenue0799M-
Total Cash7.62MN/A-
Total Debt75K50M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GAYMF vs RGLD: Fundamental Ratings
GAYMF
RGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7664
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
9755
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10067
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLD's Valuation (19) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GAYMF (66) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GAYMF (100) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's SMR Rating (55) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GAYMF (97) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

GAYMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLD (47) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GAYMF’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GAYMF (100) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GAYMFRGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GAYMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RGLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLL14.010.22
+1.60%
ProShares UltraShort Gold
XDAT27.19N/A
N/A
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
ENFR30.60-0.25
-0.81%
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
FLQL68.47-1.17
-1.68%
Franklin US Large Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
ETHW22.70-1.76
-7.20%
Bitwise Ethereum ETF

GAYMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GAYMF has been loosely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GAYMF jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAYMF
1D Price
Change %
GAYMF100%
-7.82%
HMY - GAYMF
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.26%
NGD - GAYMF
33%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
BTG - GAYMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
DRD - GAYMF
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.41%
RGLD - GAYMF
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
More

RGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLD has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGLD jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLD
1D Price
Change %
RGLD100%
-2.09%
AEM - RGLD
81%
Closely correlated
-2.44%
WPM - RGLD
81%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
AGI - RGLD
78%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
NEM - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
-3.60%
FNV - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
More