GAYMF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
39.91M
MNDJF
Price
$3.46
Change
-$0.11 (-3.08%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
118.5M
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GAYMF vs MNDJF

Header iconGAYMF vs MNDJF Comparison
Open Charts GAYMF vs MNDJFBanner chart's image
Galway Metals
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$75.23K
Capitalization39.91M
Mandalay Resources
Price$3.46
Change-$0.11 (-3.08%)
Volume$29.8K
Capitalization118.5M
GAYMF vs MNDJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GAYMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAYMF vs. MNDJF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAYMF is a Hold and MNDJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (GAYMF: $0.28 vs. MNDJF: $3.46)
Brand notoriety: GAYMF and MNDJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAYMF: 126% vs. MNDJF: 94%
Market capitalization -- GAYMF: $39.91M vs. MNDJF: $118.5M
GAYMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $39.91M. MNDJF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $118.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAYMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNDJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GAYMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNDJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNDJF is a better buy in the long-term than GAYMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GAYMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNDJF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GAYMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MNDJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GAYMF is a better buy in the short-term than MNDJF.

Price Growth

GAYMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.55% price change this week, while MNDJF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNDJF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNDJF($118M) has a higher market cap than GAYMF($39.9M). MNDJF YTD gains are higher at: 26.763 vs. GAYMF (-21.787).
GAYMFMNDJFGAYMF / MNDJF
Capitalization39.9M118M34%
EBITDAN/A63.6M-
Gain YTD-21.78726.763-81%
P/E RatioN/A8.47-
RevenueN/A180M-
Total CashN/A36.5M-
Total DebtN/A23.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GAYMF vs MNDJF: Fundamental Ratings
GAYMF
MNDJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10038
SMR RATING
1..100
9739
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10096
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNDJF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as GAYMF (58). This means that MNDJF’s stock grew similarly to GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

MNDJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GAYMF (100). This means that MNDJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

MNDJF's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GAYMF (97). This means that MNDJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

MNDJF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as GAYMF (61). This means that MNDJF’s stock grew similarly to GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

MNDJF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as GAYMF (100). This means that MNDJF’s stock grew similarly to GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GAYMFMNDJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GAYMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFCLX18.470.19
+1.04%
American Century Focused Intl Gr A
JBGAX61.700.52
+0.85%
JHancock Blue Chip Growth A
UIWGX31.890.17
+0.54%
Victory Sustainable World Institutional
HRCCX29.510.13
+0.44%
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec C
MSHPX15.22N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6

GAYMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GAYMF and MAIFF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GAYMF and MAIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAYMF
1D Price
Change %
GAYMF100%
+0.54%
MAIFF - GAYMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.14%
ARRKF - GAYMF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPTRF - GAYMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
SLVRF - GAYMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
CXBMF - GAYMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNDJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNDJF and OCGSF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNDJF and OCGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNDJF
1D Price
Change %
MNDJF100%
-3.00%
OCGSF - MNDJF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.99%
TORXF - MNDJF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%
GAYMF - MNDJF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
HSTXF - MNDJF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
WRLGF - MNDJF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
More