GARWF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
9.11M
GCCFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GARWF vs GCCFF

Header iconGARWF vs GCCFF Comparison
Open Charts GARWF vs GCCFFBanner chart's image
Golden Arrow Resource
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$62.5K
Capitalization9.11M
Golden Cariboo Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization3.15M
GARWF vs GCCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GARWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GARWF vs. GCCFF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GARWF is a Hold and GCCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GARWF: $0.05 vs. GCCFF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: GARWF and GCCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GARWF: 125% vs. GCCFF: 2%
Market capitalization -- GARWF: $9.11M vs. GCCFF: $3.15M
GARWF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.11M. GCCFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $3.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GARWF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGCCFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GARWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GCCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GARWF is a better buy in the long-term than GCCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GARWF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCCFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GARWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GCCFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCCFF is a better buy in the short-term than GARWF.

Price Growth

GARWF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -13.18% price change this week, while GCCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GARWF($9.11M) has a higher market cap than GCCFF($3.15M). GARWF YTD gains are higher at: 62.406 vs. GCCFF (-62.777). GCCFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.38M vs. GARWF (-6.67M). GARWF has more cash in the bank: 1.03M vs. GCCFF (337K). GARWF (0) and GCCFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GARWFGCCFFGARWF / GCCFF
Capitalization9.11M3.15M289%
EBITDA-6.67M-5.38M124%
Gain YTD62.406-62.777-99%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.03M337K307%
Total Debt0N/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GARWF vs GCCFF: Fundamental Ratings
GARWF
GCCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3965
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6595
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GARWF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (50). This means that GARWF’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

GARWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (100). This means that GARWF’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

GARWF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (100). This means that GARWF’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

GARWF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (65). This means that GARWF’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

GARWF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (95). This means that GARWF’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GARWFGCCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GARWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ECSNF3.04N/A
N/A
Ecosynthetix, Inc.
FRCEF1.61N/A
N/A
Fletcher Building Ltd.
IVCUF9.62N/A
N/A
Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I
RXLSF32.70N/A
N/A
Rexel SA
LTCH0.12N/A
N/A
Latch, Inc.

GARWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GARWF and FSUMF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GARWF and FSUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GARWF
1D Price
Change %
GARWF100%
-5.76%
FSUMF - GARWF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
FWEDF - GARWF
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.28%
FTMDF - GARWF
10%
Poorly correlated
-3.73%
GCCFF - GARWF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRACF - GARWF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GCCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCCFF and FEOVF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCCFF and FEOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCCFF
1D Price
Change %
GCCFF100%
N/A
FEOVF - GCCFF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MUNMF - GCCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
GARWF - GCCFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
FSUGY - GCCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
FTMDF - GCCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.73%
More