GARPY vs GLGLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GARPY is a Hold and GLGLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GARPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLGLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GARPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GLGLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
GARPY (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GLGLF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.25%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+5.17% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| GARPY | GLGLF | GARPY / GLGLF | |
| Capitalization | 2.38B | 1.72M | 138,430% |
| EBITDA | 1.81B | -700.64K | -258,336% |
| Gain YTD | 8.514 | -47.418 | -18% |
| P/E Ratio | 2.93 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 11.4B | 10.9M | 104,587% |
| Total Cash | 511M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.98B | N/A | - |
GARPY | GLGLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GARPY's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGLF (39). This means that GARPY’s stock grew similarly to GLGLF’s over the last 12 months.
GARPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLGLF (100). This means that GARPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLGLF’s over the last 12 months.
GARPY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGLF (98). This means that GARPY’s stock grew similarly to GLGLF’s over the last 12 months.
GARPY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGLF (74). This means that GARPY’s stock grew similarly to GLGLF’s over the last 12 months.
GLGLF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as GARPY (12). This means that GLGLF’s stock grew similarly to GARPY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
GARPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GARPY and GLGLF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GARPY and GLGLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GARPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARPY | 100% | N/A | ||
| GLGLF - GARPY | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GSFD - GARPY | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRGSF - GARPY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CTUNF - GARPY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GARPF - GARPY | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GLGLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLGLF and GARPY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLGLF and GARPY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLGLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLGLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GARPY - GLGLF | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GARPF - GLGLF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GSFD - GLGLF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CTUNF - GLGLF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EDESY - GLGLF | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||