GAMN
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 18 closing price
TNGPF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Ad is loading...

GAMN vs TNGPF

Header iconGAMN vs TNGPF Comparison
Open Charts GAMN vs TNGPFBanner chart's image
Great American Food Chain, Inc. (The)
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$525
CapitalizationN/A
TANG PLACE CHINA HOLDINGS
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.98K
CapitalizationN/A
GAMN vs TNGPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAMN vs. TNGPF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAMN is a Hold and TNGPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (GAMN: $0.03 vs. TNGPF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: GAMN and TNGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAMN: 77% vs. TNGPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GAMN: $228.92K vs. TNGPF: $33.2M
GAMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $228.92K. TNGPF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $33.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $213.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTNGPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GAMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TNGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GAMN and TNGPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GAMN (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TNGPF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.06% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNGPF($33.2M) has a higher market cap than GAMN($229K). GAMN YTD gains are higher at: 42.857 vs. TNGPF (-31.667).
GAMNTNGPFGAMN / TNGPF
Capitalization229K33.2M1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD42.857-31.667-135%
P/E RatioN/A7.66-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GAMN: Fundamental Ratings
GAMN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
33
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

GAMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GAMN and SIRZF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GAMN and SIRZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAMN
1D Price
Change %
GAMN100%
N/A
SIRZF - GAMN
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTBD - GAMN
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
TNGPF - GAMN
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - GAMN
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
ODDAF - GAMN
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TNGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNGPF and FAT have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNGPF and FAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNGPF
1D Price
Change %
TNGPF100%
N/A
FAT - TNGPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.15%
FWRG - TNGPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
PTLO - TNGPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
GAMN - TNGPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HELFY - TNGPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+7.42%
More