GAME
Price
$1.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
RADLF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

GAME vs RADLF

Header iconGAME vs RADLF Comparison
Open Charts GAME vs RADLFBanner chart's image
GameSquare Holdings
Price$1.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$296.07K
CapitalizationN/A
RADIAL RESH
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
GAME vs RADLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GAME
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAME vs. RADLF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAME is a Hold and RADLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (GAME: $0.98 vs. RADLF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: GAME and RADLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAME: 100% vs. RADLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GAME: $41.84M vs. RADLF: $420.1K
GAME [@Packaged Software] is valued at $41.84M. RADLF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $420.1K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAME’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRADLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GAME’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RADLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GAME is a better buy in the long-term than RADLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GAME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GAME’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GAME (@Packaged Software) experienced а +13.95% price change this week, while RADLF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

GAME is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAME($41.8M) has a higher market cap than RADLF($420K). GAME YTD gains are higher at: -43.646 vs. RADLF (-81.557). RADLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -524.25K vs. GAME (-24.13M). GAME has more cash in the bank: 2.45M vs. RADLF (436K). RADLF has less debt than GAME: RADLF (479K) vs GAME (10.5M). GAME has higher revenues than RADLF: GAME (39.9M) vs RADLF (0).
GAMERADLFGAME / RADLF
Capitalization41.8M420K9,952%
EBITDA-24.13M-524.25K4,603%
Gain YTD-43.646-81.55754%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue39.9M0-
Total Cash2.45M436K561%
Total Debt10.5M479K2,192%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GAME: Fundamental Ratings
GAME
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GAME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GAME
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

GAME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GAME and SNELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GAME and SNELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAME
1D Price
Change %
GAME100%
-0.97%
SNELF - GAME
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFIV - GAME
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
GMETF - GAME
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
RADLF - GAME
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANY - GAME
20%
Poorly correlated
-12.00%
More

RADLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RADLF has been closely correlated with SPPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RADLF jumps, then SPPL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RADLF
1D Price
Change %
RADLF100%
N/A
SPPL - RADLF
83%
Closely correlated
-7.55%
BCAN - RADLF
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
DNACF - RADLF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WPNDF - RADLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+8.70%
OSPN - RADLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
More