GAMB
Price
$8.17
Change
+$0.10 (+1.24%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
291.77M
47 days until earnings call
MSC
Price
$3.98
Change
+$0.28 (+7.57%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
766.5M
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GAMB vs MSC

Header iconGAMB vs MSC Comparison
Open Charts GAMB vs MSCBanner chart's image
Gambling.com Group
Price$8.17
Change+$0.10 (+1.24%)
Volume$388.62K
Capitalization291.77M
Studio City International Holdings
Price$3.98
Change+$0.28 (+7.57%)
Volume$3.67K
Capitalization766.5M
GAMB vs MSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GAMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAMB vs. MSC commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAMB is a Buy and MSC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GAMB: $8.17 vs. MSC: $3.80)
Brand notoriety: GAMB and MSC are both not notable
GAMB represents the Casinos/Gaming, while MSC is part of the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAMB: 29% vs. MSC: 4%
Market capitalization -- GAMB: $288.2M vs. MSC: $712.58M
GAMB [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $288.2M. MSC’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $712.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $49.06B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $36.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAMB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GAMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GAMB and MSC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GAMB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GAMB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MSC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSC is a better buy in the short-term than GAMB.

Price Growth

GAMB (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while MSC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -5.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

GAMB is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

MSC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-0.81% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-2.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSC($767M) has a higher market cap than GAMB($292M). MSC YTD gains are higher at: -29.558 vs. GAMB (-41.974). MSC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 273M vs. GAMB (33.5M). MSC has more cash in the bank: 173M vs. GAMB (18.7M). GAMB has less debt than MSC: GAMB (95.6M) vs MSC (2.18B). MSC has higher revenues than GAMB: MSC (679M) vs GAMB (148M).
GAMBMSCGAMB / MSC
Capitalization292M767M38%
EBITDA33.5M273M12%
Gain YTD-41.974-29.558142%
P/E Ratio20.95N/A-
Revenue148M679M22%
Total Cash18.7M173M11%
Total Debt95.6M2.18B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSC: Fundamental Ratings
MSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
92
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
25

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GAMBMSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GAMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCGLY13.470.19
+1.43%
Societe Generale
XTGRF2.16N/A
N/A
Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.
CCOHF0.88N/A
N/A
China State Construction International Holdings, Ltd.
CTYMF5.39N/A
N/A
Catalyst Metals Ltd.
ZEOX1.38-0.04
-2.96%
Zeo ScientifiX Inc.

GAMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GAMB has been loosely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GAMB jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAMB
1D Price
Change %
GAMB100%
+1.24%
CZR - GAMB
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.36%
FLUT - GAMB
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
GDEN - GAMB
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
DKNG - GAMB
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
BYD - GAMB
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
More

MSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSC and WYNN have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSC and WYNN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSC
1D Price
Change %
MSC100%
+7.57%
WYNN - MSC
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
BALY - MSC
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.25%
MTN - MSC
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
GAMB - MSC
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
DKNG - MSC
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
More