GAMB
Price
$8.26
Change
+$0.04 (+0.49%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
294.99M
68 days until earnings call
MSC
Price
$3.85
Change
-$0.28 (-6.78%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
741.46M
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GAMB vs MSC

Header iconGAMB vs MSC Comparison
Open Charts GAMB vs MSCBanner chart's image
Gambling.com Group
Price$8.26
Change+$0.04 (+0.49%)
Volume$714.41K
Capitalization294.99M
Studio City International Holdings
Price$3.85
Change-$0.28 (-6.78%)
Volume$2.36K
Capitalization741.46M
GAMB vs MSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GAMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAMB vs. MSC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAMB is a StrongBuy and MSC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GAMB: $8.26 vs. MSC: $3.85)
Brand notoriety: GAMB and MSC are both not notable
GAMB represents the Casinos/Gaming, while MSC is part of the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAMB: 116% vs. MSC: 32%
Market capitalization -- GAMB: $294.99M vs. MSC: $741.46M
GAMB [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $294.99M. MSC’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $741.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $51.92B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $36.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.41B. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAMB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GAMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GAMB and MSC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GAMB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GAMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MSC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GAMB is a better buy in the short-term than MSC.

Price Growth

GAMB (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -5.38% price change this week, while MSC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -20.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.70%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

GAMB is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

MSC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+2.49% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.63% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSC($741M) has a higher market cap than GAMB($295M). MSC YTD gains are higher at: -31.858 vs. GAMB (-41.335). MSC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 273M vs. GAMB (33.9M). MSC has more cash in the bank: 173M vs. GAMB (18.7M). GAMB has less debt than MSC: GAMB (95.6M) vs MSC (2.18B). MSC has higher revenues than GAMB: MSC (679M) vs GAMB (148M).
GAMBMSCGAMB / MSC
Capitalization295M741M40%
EBITDA33.9M273M12%
Gain YTD-41.335-31.858130%
P/E Ratio21.18N/A-
Revenue148M679M22%
Total Cash18.7M173M11%
Total Debt95.6M2.18B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSC: Fundamental Ratings
MSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
21

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GAMBMSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GAMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRARF18.560.26
+1.42%
Credit Agricole SA
MAAL1.37N/A
N/A
Marketing Alliance, Inc. (The)
PGPKY5.84N/A
N/A
PGE Polska Energetyczna SA
SLOIF37.51N/A
N/A
Soitec, Bernin
BUKS1.54-0.06
-3.75%
Butler National Corp.

GAMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GAMB has been loosely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GAMB jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAMB
1D Price
Change %
GAMB100%
+0.49%
CZR - GAMB
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
FLUT - GAMB
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
GDEN - GAMB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
BYD - GAMB
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.01%
DKNG - GAMB
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
More

MSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSC and WYNN have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSC and WYNN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSC
1D Price
Change %
MSC100%
-6.78%
WYNN - MSC
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
GAMB - MSC
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
BALY - MSC
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.60%
DKNG - MSC
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
INSE - MSC
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
More