GAMB
Price
$8.61
Change
-$1.77 (-17.05%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
307.49M
88 days until earnings call
GEBHF
Price
$0.77
Change
+$0.07 (+10.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.82B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GAMB vs GEBHF

Header iconGAMB vs GEBHF Comparison
Open Charts GAMB vs GEBHFBanner chart's image
Gambling.com Group
Price$8.61
Change-$1.77 (-17.05%)
Volume$4.46M
Capitalization307.49M
Genting Berhad
Price$0.77
Change+$0.07 (+10.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.82B
GAMB vs GEBHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GAMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAMB vs. GEBHF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAMB is a Hold and GEBHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (GAMB: $8.61 vs. GEBHF: $0.77)
Brand notoriety: GAMB and GEBHF are both not notable
GAMB represents the Casinos/Gaming, while GEBHF is part of the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAMB: 898% vs. GEBHF: 43%
Market capitalization -- GAMB: $307.49M vs. GEBHF: $2.82B
GAMB [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $307.49M. GEBHF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $2.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $51.56B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $36.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.45B. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAMB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGEBHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GAMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GEBHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GAMB is a better buy in the long-term than GEBHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GAMB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GEBHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GAMB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GEBHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GEBHF is a better buy in the short-term than GAMB.

Price Growth

GAMB (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -13.47% price change this week, while GEBHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +9.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.49%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

GAMB is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-0.81% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+0.29% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GEBHF($2.82B) has a higher market cap than GAMB($307M). GEBHF has higher P/E ratio than GAMB: GEBHF (41.95) vs GAMB (22.08). GEBHF YTD gains are higher at: -16.109 vs. GAMB (-38.849). GEBHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.22B vs. GAMB (51M). GEBHF has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. GAMB (21.5M). GAMB has less debt than GEBHF: GAMB (93.4M) vs GEBHF (40.2B). GEBHF has higher revenues than GAMB: GEBHF (26.8B) vs GAMB (139M).
GAMBGEBHFGAMB / GEBHF
Capitalization307M2.82B11%
EBITDA51M8.22B1%
Gain YTD-38.849-16.109241%
P/E Ratio22.0841.9553%
Revenue139M26.8B1%
Total Cash21.5M21.7B0%
Total Debt93.4M40.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GEBHF: Fundamental Ratings
GEBHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GAMBGEBHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GAMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWICX72.150.06
+0.08%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R3
VVIPX15.33N/A
N/A
Voya VACS Index S
MADAX26.79-0.01
-0.04%
Madison Dividend Income A
SGIFX39.27-0.13
-0.33%
Steward Global Equity Income Fund C
JISCX22.60-0.21
-0.92%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value S

GAMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GAMB has been loosely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GAMB jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAMB
1D Price
Change %
GAMB100%
-17.05%
CZR - GAMB
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
DKNG - GAMB
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.91%
GDEN - GAMB
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
BYD - GAMB
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
MGM - GAMB
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
More

GEBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GEBHF and GAMB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GEBHF and GAMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEBHF
1D Price
Change %
GEBHF100%
+9.92%
GAMB - GEBHF
32%
Poorly correlated
-17.05%
ARHN - GEBHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHY - GEBHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
PYTCF - GEBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHF - GEBHF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More