GALKF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
6.77M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RBTK
Price
$12.22
Change
+$8.12 (+198.05%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GALKF vs RBTK

Header iconGALKF vs RBTK Comparison
Open Charts GALKF vs RBTKBanner chart's image
Galantas Gold
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.37K
Capitalization6.77M
Zhen Ding Resources
Price$12.22
Change+$8.12 (+198.05%)
Volume$600
Capitalization1.36B
GALKF vs RBTK Comparison Chart in %
GALKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBTK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GALKF vs. RBTK commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GALKF is a Hold and RBTK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GALKF: $0.04 vs. RBTK: $12.22)
Brand notoriety: GALKF and RBTK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GALKF: 56% vs. RBTK: 5%
Market capitalization -- GALKF: $6.77M vs. RBTK: $1.36B
GALKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $6.77M. RBTK’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $125.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GALKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRBTK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GALKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RBTK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBTK is a better buy in the long-term than GALKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GALKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBTK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GALKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RBTK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GALKF is a better buy in the short-term than RBTK.

Price Growth

GALKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -26.68% price change this week, while RBTK (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.32% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBTK($1.36B) has a higher market cap than GALKF($6.77M). RBTK YTD gains are higher at: 460.550 vs. GALKF (10.372). RBTK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 282K vs. GALKF (-2.2M). RBTK has more cash in the bank: 28.6K vs. GALKF (19.9K). GALKF has less debt than RBTK: GALKF (1.08M) vs RBTK (3.5M). GALKF (0) and RBTK (0) have equivalent revenues.
GALKFRBTKGALKF / RBTK
Capitalization6.77M1.36B0%
EBITDA-2.2M282K-779%
Gain YTD10.372460.5502%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash19.9K28.6K70%
Total Debt1.08M3.5M31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GALKF vs RBTK: Fundamental Ratings
GALKF
RBTK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
9897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5040

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBTK's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GALKF (93). This means that RBTK’s stock grew significantly faster than GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

RBTK's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (100). This means that RBTK’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

RBTK's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (98). This means that RBTK’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

RBTK's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (65). This means that RBTK’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

RBTK's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (100). This means that RBTK’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GALKFRBTK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GALKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBTK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CENX40.180.87
+2.21%
Century Aluminum Company
WIT2.920.01
+0.34%
Wipro Limited
FWRD25.520.07
+0.28%
Forward Air Corp
MNSB21.01-0.10
-0.47%
MainStreet Bancshares
ROLR1.41-0.02
-1.40%
High Roller Technologies Inc

GALKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GALKF and AUGO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GALKF and AUGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GALKF
1D Price
Change %
GALKF100%
+3.75%
AUGO - GALKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.42%
WGXRF - GALKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.66%
ORFDF - GALKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+11.73%
NSUPF - GALKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAGF - GALKF
16%
Poorly correlated
+14.05%
More

RBTK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBTK and GALKF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBTK and GALKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBTK
1D Price
Change %
RBTK100%
N/A
GALKF - RBTK
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
FTCO - RBTK
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
MAKAF - RBTK
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAGF - RBTK
-5%
Poorly correlated
+14.05%
GROY - RBTK
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More