GALKF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.22M
RBTK
Price
$1.26
Change
-$0.37 (-22.70%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
139.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GALKF vs RBTK

Header iconGALKF vs RBTK Comparison
Open Charts GALKF vs RBTKBanner chart's image
Galantas Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$87.65K
Capitalization6.22M
Zhen Ding Resources
Price$1.26
Change-$0.37 (-22.70%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization139.12M
GALKF vs RBTK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GALKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBTK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GALKF vs. RBTK commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GALKF is a Hold and RBTK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GALKF: $0.06 vs. RBTK: $1.26)
Brand notoriety: GALKF and RBTK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GALKF: 108% vs. RBTK: 25%
Market capitalization -- GALKF: $6.22M vs. RBTK: $139.12M
GALKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $6.22M. RBTK’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $139.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GALKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRBTK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GALKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RBTK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GALKF and RBTK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GALKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBTK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GALKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RBTK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBTK is a better buy in the short-term than GALKF.

Price Growth

GALKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -17.29% price change this week, while RBTK (@Precious Metals) price change was -24.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6065.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBTK($139M) has a higher market cap than GALKF($6.22M). GALKF YTD gains are higher at: 53.989 vs. RBTK (-42.202). GALKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 917K vs. RBTK (275K). GALKF has more cash in the bank: 729K vs. RBTK (18.4K). RBTK has less debt than GALKF: RBTK (3.43M) vs GALKF (7.01M). GALKF (0) and RBTK (0) have equivalent revenues.
GALKFRBTKGALKF / RBTK
Capitalization6.22M139M4%
EBITDA917K275K333%
Gain YTD53.989-42.202-128%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash729K18.4K3,962%
Total Debt7.01M3.43M204%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GALKF vs RBTK: Fundamental Ratings
GALKF
RBTK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1089
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3888
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBTK's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GALKF (93). This means that RBTK’s stock grew significantly faster than GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

RBTK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (100). This means that RBTK’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

GALKF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as RBTK (97). This means that GALKF’s stock grew similarly to RBTK’s over the last 12 months.

GALKF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBTK (88). This means that GALKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBTK’s over the last 12 months.

GALKF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RBTK (100). This means that GALKF’s stock grew similarly to RBTK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GALKFRBTK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GALKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBTK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYMPX206.671.80
+0.88%
Rydex Precious Metals H
CUSRX14.37N/A
N/A
Cullen Small Cap Value Retail
GUXPX5.68N/A
N/A
Gabelli Utilities C
JLCFX76.00-0.65
-0.85%
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R4
FCUEX20.52-0.18
-0.87%
NYLI PineStone U.S. Equity Class A

GALKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GALKF and ORFDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GALKF and ORFDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GALKF
1D Price
Change %
GALKF100%
-23.12%
ORFDF - GALKF
22%
Poorly correlated
+13.89%
NSUPF - GALKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
AUGO - GALKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.91%
SMAGF - GALKF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
RBTK - GALKF
10%
Poorly correlated
-22.89%
More

RBTK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBTK and GALKF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBTK and GALKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBTK
1D Price
Change %
RBTK100%
-22.89%
GALKF - RBTK
10%
Poorly correlated
-23.12%
FTCO - RBTK
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
MAKAF - RBTK
-1%
Poorly correlated
-14.49%
GROY - RBTK
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
SMAGF - RBTK
-3%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
More