GALKF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.37M
RBTK
Price
$1.10
Change
-$0.90 (-45.00%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
121.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GALKF vs RBTK

Header iconGALKF vs RBTK Comparison
Open Charts GALKF vs RBTKBanner chart's image
Galantas Gold
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$77.15K
Capitalization10.37M
Zhen Ding Resources
Price$1.10
Change-$0.90 (-45.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization121.45M
GALKF vs RBTK Comparison Chart in %
GALKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBTK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GALKF vs. RBTK commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GALKF is a Hold and RBTK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GALKF: $0.08 vs. RBTK: $1.10)
Brand notoriety: GALKF and RBTK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GALKF: 79% vs. RBTK: 3%
Market capitalization -- GALKF: $10.37M vs. RBTK: $121.45M
GALKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $10.37M. RBTK’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $121.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $112.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GALKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRBTK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GALKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RBTK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GALKF and RBTK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GALKF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBTK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GALKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RBTK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GALKF is a better buy in the short-term than RBTK.

Price Growth

GALKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.47% price change this week, while RBTK (@Precious Metals) price change was -45.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1194.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBTK($121M) has a higher market cap than GALKF($10.4M). GALKF YTD gains are higher at: 125.532 vs. RBTK (-49.541). GALKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 917K vs. RBTK (275K). GALKF has more cash in the bank: 729K vs. RBTK (18.4K). RBTK has less debt than GALKF: RBTK (3.43M) vs GALKF (7.01M). GALKF (0) and RBTK (0) have equivalent revenues.
GALKFRBTKGALKF / RBTK
Capitalization10.4M121M9%
EBITDA917K275K333%
Gain YTD125.532-49.541-253%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash729K18.4K3,962%
Total Debt7.01M3.43M204%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GALKF vs RBTK: Fundamental Ratings
GALKF
RBTK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3996
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a34

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBTK's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GALKF (93). This means that RBTK’s stock grew significantly faster than GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

RBTK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (100). This means that RBTK’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

GALKF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as RBTK (97). This means that GALKF’s stock grew similarly to RBTK’s over the last 12 months.

GALKF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBTK (96). This means that GALKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBTK’s over the last 12 months.

GALKF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RBTK (100). This means that GALKF’s stock grew similarly to RBTK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GALKFRBTK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GALKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBTK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNPCF14.50N/A
N/A
Dai Nippon Printing Co. Ltd.
IMMVF0.15N/A
N/A
Immunovia AB
ATLFF14.86N/A
N/A
Atlas Copco AB
LGYV2.50N/A
N/A
Legacy Ventures International Inc.
PPTTF12.10N/A
N/A
Perpetual Ltd

GALKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GALKF and AUGO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GALKF and AUGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GALKF
1D Price
Change %
GALKF100%
+3.29%
AUGO - GALKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.26%
WGXRF - GALKF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.27%
ORFDF - GALKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
NSUPF - GALKF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
SMAGF - GALKF
16%
Poorly correlated
-9.22%
More

RBTK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBTK and GALKF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBTK and GALKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBTK
1D Price
Change %
RBTK100%
N/A
GALKF - RBTK
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
FTCO - RBTK
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
MAKAF - RBTK
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAGF - RBTK
-5%
Poorly correlated
-9.22%
GROY - RBTK
-5%
Poorly correlated
-7.92%
More