GALKF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.22M
NSUPF
Price
$1.15
Change
+$0.03 (+2.68%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
200.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GALKF vs NSUPF

Header iconGALKF vs NSUPF Comparison
Open Charts GALKF vs NSUPFBanner chart's image
Galantas Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$87.65K
Capitalization6.22M
Northern Superior Resources
Price$1.15
Change+$0.03 (+2.68%)
Volume$199.99K
Capitalization200.07M
GALKF vs NSUPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GALKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GALKF vs. NSUPF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GALKF is a Hold and NSUPF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GALKF: $0.06 vs. NSUPF: $1.15)
Brand notoriety: GALKF and NSUPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GALKF: 108% vs. NSUPF: 69%
Market capitalization -- GALKF: $6.22M vs. NSUPF: $200.07M
GALKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $6.22M. NSUPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $200.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GALKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNSUPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GALKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NSUPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NSUPF is a better buy in the long-term than GALKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GALKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSUPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GALKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NSUPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NSUPF is a better buy in the short-term than GALKF.

Price Growth

GALKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -17.29% price change this week, while NSUPF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6065.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSUPF($200M) has a higher market cap than GALKF($6.22M). NSUPF YTD gains are higher at: 234.419 vs. GALKF (53.989). GALKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 917K vs. NSUPF (-16.45M). NSUPF has more cash in the bank: 9.94M vs. GALKF (729K). GALKF (0) and NSUPF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GALKFNSUPFGALKF / NSUPF
Capitalization6.22M200M3%
EBITDA917K-16.45M-6%
Gain YTD53.989234.41923%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash729K9.94M7%
Total Debt7.01MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GALKF vs NSUPF: Fundamental Ratings
GALKF
NSUPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1073
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10055
SMR RATING
1..100
9699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GALKF's Valuation (93) in the null industry is in the same range as NSUPF (96). This means that GALKF’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GALKF (100). This means that NSUPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

GALKF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as NSUPF (99). This means that GALKF’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (38). This means that NSUPF’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (100). This means that NSUPF’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GALKFNSUPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GALKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALM5.650.05
+0.89%
Almonty Industries Inc
CRWD473.09-3.24
-0.68%
CrowdStrike Holdings
FATBB2.51-0.03
-1.07%
FAT Brands
ALK51.29-1.61
-3.04%
Alaska Air Group
NMRA1.70-0.13
-7.10%
Neumora Therapeutics

GALKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GALKF and ORFDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GALKF and ORFDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GALKF
1D Price
Change %
GALKF100%
-23.12%
ORFDF - GALKF
22%
Poorly correlated
+13.89%
NSUPF - GALKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
AUGO - GALKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.91%
SMAGF - GALKF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
RBTK - GALKF
10%
Poorly correlated
-22.89%
More

NSUPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSUPF has been loosely correlated with STLRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSUPF jumps, then STLRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSUPF
1D Price
Change %
NSUPF100%
+2.86%
STLRF - NSUPF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
CGLCF - NSUPF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
LGDTF - NSUPF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
BCEKF - NSUPF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
BYAGF - NSUPF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
More