Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAHPX vs RNWBX
GAHPX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GAHPX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq P
Price$33.75
Change+$3.59 (+11.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.09B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GAHPX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAHPX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAHPX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GAHPX (3.09B). GAHPX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GAHPX (0.72) vs RNWBX (0.45). GAHPX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GAHPX (8 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than GAHPX (1.12). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GAHPX (43.00). GAHPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: GAHPX (0) vs RNWBX (250). GAHPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.04 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. GAHPX (6.29).
| GAHPX | RNWBX | GAHPX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.66 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.186 | 5.996 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.09B | 75.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.45 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.04 | 26.27 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.88 | 38.81 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.29 | 7.03 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement