Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs ZVNBX
GAFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$82.92
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.09
Change+$0.58 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.07M
GAFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. ZVNBX (147M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: GAFFX (0.61) vs ZVNBX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GAFFX (8 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). GAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). ZVNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: ZVNBX (2500) vs GAFFX (1000000). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.78 vs. GAFFX (11.26). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.33 vs. ZVNBX (39.42).
| GAFFX | ZVNBX | GAFFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.30 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.52 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.347 | 11.261 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 147M | 219,728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.26 | 27.78 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.93 | 127.76 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.33 | 39.42 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement