Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs ZVNBX
GAFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$84.53
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.25
Change+$0.38 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.51M
GAFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. ZVNBX (147M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: GAFFX (0.61) vs ZVNBX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GAFFX (9 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). GAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). ZVNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: ZVNBX (2500) vs GAFFX (1000000). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.84 vs. GAFFX (18.19). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.79 vs. ZVNBX (39.16).
| GAFFX | ZVNBX | GAFFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.30 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.52 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.509 | 11.684 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 147M | 223,129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.19 | 38.84 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.69 | 119.71 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.79 | 39.16 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement