Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs ZVNBX
GAFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$79.68
Change-$9.69 (-10.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$38.95
Change-$5.53 (-12.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.82M
GAFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Hold and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ZVNBX (124M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: GAFFX (0.55) vs ZVNBX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GAFFX (9 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.29). GAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). ZVNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: ZVNBX (2500) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.10 vs. ZVNBX (-1.02). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.15 vs. ZVNBX (-17.67).
| GAFFX | ZVNBX | GAFFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.30 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.46 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.994 | -5.162 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 124M | 270,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | -1.02 | -305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.51 | 80.66 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.15 | -17.67 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 382.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement